Got it, CDH5 Beta 2 was recently released which is 0.96 proper, fyi.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:47 AM, James Taylor <[email protected]>wrote: > No, AFAIK, the HBase 0.95 branch is a dead-end - that's in Apache > HBase-land - I don't know about the distributions that other companies put > out. I'm not sure what kind of upgrade path there is from 0.95 either. > > Ask on the HBase user list to get more clarity. > > Thanks, > James > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:21 AM, Dan Di Spaltro > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Isn't 0.95 just the dev branch for 0.96 sorta like how the linux kernel >> used to work? >> >> -Dan >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 7:11 PM, James Taylor <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I don't think any HBase work is happening for 0.95, but you may want to >>> check with the HBase user list. Phoenix has no plans to support it, though. >>> We are working on Phoenix for 0.96 and 0.98. It's pretty far along - it's >>> in the 4.0 branch. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> James >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Abe Weinograd <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I was following a thread on the old GitHub repo and google group about >>>> post 0.94 compatibility. I have CDH5 installed (HBase 0.95.2). I built >>>> and deployed the latest of the master branch on the apache repo. Should >>>> this work? Right now, I am getting the following error on trying to >>>> connect: >>>> >>>> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Not a host:port pair: PBUF >>>> ' >>>> ip-10-10-0-12.ec2.internal\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd( >>>> at >>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Addressing.parseHostname(Addressing.java:60) >>>> at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ServerName.<init>(ServerName.java:101) >>>> at >>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ServerName.parseVersionedServerName(ServerName.java:283) >>>> ....... >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Dan Di Spaltro >> > > -- Dan Di Spaltro
