Yes it was started with 0.7 and improved for 0.8. It is based on GruntParser
and PigServer interfaces which did not change too much I think and it is
rather simple overall.

We did a recent
cleanup<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1600?focusedCommentId=12922785&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_12922785>
and
there is some 
XML<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pig/branches/branch-0.8/src/docs/src/documentation/content/xdocs/pigunit.xml?view=markup>documentation.

Feel free to post your solution. We can work and see how we could integrate
it or if it is better.

Romain

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Dave Wellman <[email protected]> wrote:

> Excellent suggestion Dmitriy, Thanks.
>
> On Oct 20, 2010, at 11:58 AM, Dmitriy Ryaboy wrote:
>
> > At least the earlier versions of the PigUnit patch should work with 0.7
> >
> > Regardless, Dave, please post your contribution to the JIRA, or better
> > yet see if it can be integrated with PigUnit if it and your work are
> > complementary.
> >
> > -D
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Josh Devins <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> No idea, haven't used it myself yet. I just remember seeing the Jira
> issue
> >> go by. There's patches attached to the issue so it might be
> back-portable.
> >>
> >> But either way, please share!
> >>
> >> Josh
> >>
> >>
> >> On 20 October 2010 18:46, Dave Wellman <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Can it patch to Pig 6 & Pig 7 or is it a Pig 8 solution?
> >>>
> >>> On Oct 20, 2010, at 10:22 AM, Josh Devins wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> You might want to also have a look at Pig trunk/0.8.0 since there's
> >>> already
> >>>> some work been done on this topic.
> >>>>
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1404
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>>
> >>>> Josh
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 20 October 2010 16:58, Dave Wellman <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> All,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have a solution for writing unit test in Java to test pig scripts
> >>>>> including stats and output if anyone is interested.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to