The issue here seems to be that the operator id is getting taken for the bag
name. I'm not aware of any existing issues to fix this. You'll need to
propose how we come up with a unique, humanly usable name for this (op-1, op-2,
... maybe?).
Alan.
On Feb 13, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Jonathan Coveney wrote:
> On pig9, if you do the following:
>
> a = load 'thing' as (x:int); b = group (distinct a) by $0; describe b;
>
> the schema is:
>
> b: {group: int,1-631: {(x: int)}}
>
> Every time you run the above, the range will change. This is also an issue
> in trunk. I can open a ticket if there is nothing currently?
