Daniel, Not sure you saw this. We will have to document the performance implications of hive udfs. Does the wrapping/unwrapping cause significant overhead to impact performance or is it negligible?
Regards, Rohini On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Eyal Allweil < eyal_allw...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > Is there any reason not use Hive UDF's in Pig 0.15? > I'm thinking mostly about performance, but if there are any other reasons > I'd be happy to hear them. > For example, we have a simple Java implementation of lpad that we use. > Should we bother keeping it, or can we use the Hive version? > I posted a question about this on StackOverflow, but it didn't seem to get > anyone's attention. > Thanks,Eyal > Using Hive UDF's in Pig > > | | > | | | | | | | | > | Using Hive UDF's in PigIs there any reason not use Hive UDF's in Pig > 0.15? I'm thinking mostly about performance, but if there are any other > reasons I'd be happy to hear them. For example... | > | | > | View on stackoverflow.com | Preview by Yahoo | > | | > | | > > >
