I personally find Maven to be a bit cumbersome - but in any case, Ant is appropriate for our needs and works well, so there's no compelling reason to switch. And don't forget that Ant is an Apache project too. :-)
On May 4, 2010, at 6:30 PM, Patrick Shea wrote: > Oh boy... I had the same kind of reactions when I tried to introduce ant 10 > years ago... > > I don't know of any serious project today not using maven. > > Patrick > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Christopher Brind" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, May 4, 2010 6:17pm > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Mavenization of pivot? > > Maven is the marmite of the software world. :) > > (I'm not a fan either, to be honest.) > > > > On 4 May 2010 23:14, Dirk Moebius <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thank god - I hate maven. >> >> >> "Greg Brown" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> No plans to switch to Maven. >>> >>> On May 4, 2010, at 3:43 PM, Patrick Shea wrote: >>> >>>> Is there any plan to get rid of ant and switch completely to maven? It >> would be nice to be able to compile easily, produce javadocs and sources >> jar's. >>>> >>>> Patrick >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > >
