I have a question : when we need several variables for function, if
it's possible, what's the syntax ?
function toUpperCase(value1, value2) {
return value2.toUpperCase() + " " value2.toUpperCase();
}
Le 27/08/2010 19:26, Olivier Dutrieux a écrit :
I will test it now :)
Le 27/08/2010 17:15, Greg Brown a écrit :
Hi all,
I have just checked in support for this feature. The Property Binding
tutorial includes a demonstration:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pivot/trunk/tutorials/src/org/apache/pivot/tutorials/databinding/property_binding.bxml
For example:
function toUpperCase(value) {
return value.toUpperCase();
}
<TextInput bxml:id="textInput" Form.label="Text Input"/>
<Label Form.label="Uppercase Text"
text="${toUpperCase:textInput.text}"/>
There is also an example of creating a mapping in Java:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pivot/trunk/tutorials/src/org/apache/pivot/tutorials/databinding/PropertyBinding.java
You may notice that I chose to use the "foo:bar" syntax to specify a
mapping function rather than "foo(bar)". I did this for the following
reasons:
1) It is easier to parse.
2) It doesn't look like a function, whereas "foo(bar)" does. The user
might incorrectly assume that "foo(bar)" is an inline function
declaration, which it is not (it is never actually evaluated by the
script engine - the function referred to by this expression is what
is actually evaluated).
3) It may look like a JavaScript function, but it doesn't look like a
Groovy closure, for example. If Groovy is being used as the page
language, this could be confusing.
Let me know if you have any questions or comments.
Thanks!
Greg
On Aug 25, 2010, at 8:10 AM, Greg Brown wrote:
