I'm sorry, I don't completely understand that reasoning. If you create a class
Foo that extends Component, you can use it in BXML just like any other
component:
<my:Foo>
...
</my:Foo>
You don't need some intermediate parent:
<my:Bar>
<content>
<my:Foo>
...
</my:Foo>
</content>
</my:Bar>
(though the <content> tag could be optional if it was defined as the default
property)
But without a concrete example, I'm really not sure what to suggest.
G
On Dec 2, 2010, at 10:44 PM, Bill van Melle wrote:
> Why not simply use the child element as the root?
>
> Because I want a class backing the bxml to provide behavior and whatnot.
