Hi Mars,

I guess my choice of words could have been better here! No problem with the
buildpack, ran exactly as per instructions given.

I have the persistent fs setup but I'll look into it further, seems to fail
on the very last step : (

Thanks for your input.

Pat - sounds good, look forward to the announcement!


On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 at 21:03 Mars Hall <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Daniel,
>
> If you think there's a problem with the PredictionIO buildpack for Heroku,
> please file as issue on its GitHub repo
> https://github.com/heroku/predictionio-buildpack/issues
>
> If it works locally but not on Heroku, my wild guess is that one of your
> algorithms is serializing the model to the filesystem, and it's throwing an
> error when trying to retrieve that model. Heroku does not support
> filesystem persistence between runs (e.g. files committed during
> release/train will not persist to web/deploy)
>
> Perhaps try enabling S3 HDFS for filesystem persistence
> https://github.com/heroku/predictionio-buildpack/blob/master/CUSTOM.md#optional-persistent-filesystem
> Note that with HDFS filesystem path references must be from `/` root, not
> nested in a User ID directory.
>
> *Mars
>
> ( <> .. <> )
>
> > On Jan 10, 2017, at 00:53, Daniel O' Shaughnessy <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Pat,
> >
> > Ya I guess it's an issue with the pio heroku buildpack. It seems to
> build and train OK based on the logs but then throws that error when trying
> to deploy.
> >
> > I'm not actually using the similar products template I'm using this:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-predictionio-template-ecom-recommender
> >
> > I'm trying to extend the ecom template to include 'likes' to try and
> improve the results and using the tutorial as a guideline. I'm using this
> for an app store recommender...Ideally I'd be using the UR but I can't get
> this up on Heroku so far, when AWS approve it I may go down that route for
> hosting eventually.
> >
> > On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 at 20:44 Pat Ferrel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > AFAIK, the Heroku support is fairly new so not surprising that a
> multiple engine template has trouble. Multiple Algorithms in a Template are
> fairly rare. I’d ask Heroku what is going on.
> >
> > BTW what are you using this for? There are other ways to get similar
> products—some of which may work better. For instance is there a reason for
> multiple algorithms?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jan 9, 2017, at 10:45 AM, Daniel O' Shaughnessy <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm attempting to add a like/dislike event to the ecom recommender ( as
> per
> http://predictionio.incubator.apache.org/templates/similarproduct/multi-events-multi-algos/
> ). This method combines the results of 2 separate algorithms in the Serving
> class.
> >
> > When I deploy this using the predictionIO Heroku buildpack it seems to
> deploy and run the release command OK but when I check the Heroku logs it
> fails here:
> >
> > 2017-01-09T15:32:44.905195+00:00 app[web.1]: [INFO] [Engine] Using
> persisted model
> >
> > 2017-01-09T15:32:44.912783+00:00 app[web.1]: [INFO] [Engine] Loaded
> model com.dos.sfdc.ECommModel for algorithm com.dos.sfdc.ECommAlgorithm
> >
> > 2017-01-09T15:32:45.307111+00:00 app[web.1]: [INFO] [Engine]
> Custom-persisted model detected for algorithm com.dos.sfdc.LikeAlgorithm
> >
> > 2017-01-09T15:32:45.668678+00:00 app[web.1]: [ERROR] [OneForOneStrategy]
> Cannot call methods on a stopped SparkContext.
> >
> > 2017-01-09T15:32:45.668690+00:00 app[web.1]: This stopped SparkContext
> was created at:
> >
> > 2017-01-09T15:32:45.668691+00:00 app[web.1]:
> >
> > 2017-01-09T15:32:45.668692+00:00 app[web.1]:
> org.apache.spark.SparkContext.<init>(SparkContext.scala:82)
> >
> > 2017-01-09T15:32:45.668693+00:00 app[web.1]:
> org.apache.predictionio.workflow.WorkflowContext$.apply(WorkflowContext.scala:45)
> >
> > 2017-01-09T15:32:45.668694+00:00 app[web.1]:
> org.apache.predictionio.workflow.CreateServer$.createServerActorWithEngine(CreateServer.scala:228)
> >
> > Anyone come across this before?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> > Daniel.
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to