Thanks! I finally use com.google.code.maven-replacer-plugin for generating my protos as used in ratis-proto and it works well.
Best, tison. Mukul Kumar Singh <[email protected]> 于2019年12月3日周二 下午11:05写道： > Hi Tison, > > In Ozone the proto files are compiled using the maven plugin. > > Please find usage in the following file > https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/blob/master/hadoop-hdds/common/pom.xml#L178 > . > > > Thanks, > > Mukul > > > On 30/11/19 4:13 pm, tison wrote: > > Hello here again, > > I'm not sure how "Ozone uses the shaded ByteString version". Could you > please show me the way for doing so? > > Best, > tison. > > > tison <[email protected]> 于2019年11月14日周四 上午11:20写道： > >> Thanks for your information Mukul! >> >> I have one more question. Even if I want to use the shaded ByteString >> version when >> compile with protoc it requires protobuf-java deps. How can I configure >> protoc use >> the shaded version to generate codes? >> >> Best, >> tison. >> >> >> Mukul Kumar Singh <[email protected]> 于2019年11月14日周四 上午11:15写道： >> >>> Hi Tison, >>> >>> Thanks for the interest in Ratis. There are 2 options as you have >>> already noticed. >>> >>> a) Ozone which is a consumer of Ratis, we have used the shaded >>> ByteString version in the Ozone codebase. >>> >>> b) We can have a utility for conversion as you have already pointed out. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Mukul >>> >>> >>> On 13/11/19 8:28 pm, tison wrote: >>> >>> Well I find a way to write a utility for convertion. >>> >>> Best, >>> tison. >>> >>> >>> tison <[email protected]> 于2019年11月13日周三 下午10:46写道： >>> >>>> Hi devs, >>>> >>>> I am trying to develop a filesystem-view storage on ratis, and here is >>>> the problem I meet: >>>> >>>> When I trying to reply within `StateMachine#query` while generating >>>> Message, compiler fails on >>>> ByteString is not compatible with ByteString. I think it is because >>>> ratis use shaded protobuf deps. >>>> >>>> However, how can I instance Message outside ratis project? Shall I also >>>> depends on >>>> ratis-thirdparty-misc? Is there a workaround? Or will ratis provides >>>> its own abstraction for >>>> resolving dep issues? >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> tison. >>>> >>>
