Its there, thanks a lot.

Rupert

On 18 December 2014 at 05:13, Greg Trasuk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Rupert:
>
> It may take some time to get replicated into Central, but I’ve published
> tools.jar under the following gav coords:
>
> <groupId>org.apache.river</groupId>
> <artifactId>tools</artifactId>
> <version>2.2.2</version>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Greg Trasuk.
>
> On Dec 17, 2014, at 4:31 AM, Greg Trasuk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > There will be a new tools.jar with much the same content, including
> ClassServer.  It will just be a different gav coordinate and a different
> package name.
> >
> > The basic problem is that the ‘tools.jar’ that we currently have
> contains a circular dependency.  ‘tools.jar’ currently contains the
> ‘ClassDepend’ tool, which is used in building the River jar files, but
> ‘tools.jar’ also contains classes that reference classes that are in
> ‘jsk-lib.jar’ and ‘jsk-platform.jar’.  So, we’re splitting out the build
> tools from the runtime tools and pulling them both out of the main River
> build.  Also making them a Maven build.
> >
> > You can browse  the runtime tools project currently in svn at:
> >        http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/river-rt-tools/trunk/
> > If you’re familiar with Maven I’m sure you’ll get the gist of it.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Greg.
> >
> > On Dec 17, 2014, at 4:16 AM, Rupert Smith <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 16 December 2014 at 17:12, Greg Trasuk <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I’d suggest option 2, since that’s the way we’re moving to in the
> future.
> >>> I’m hoping to call for a release of the river-rt-tools modules in a
> week or
> >>> two, at which point we likely will remove them from the 2.2 branch and
> >>> release 2.2.3 without them (although they might just be deprecated -
> that’s
> >>> a different discussion).  Also at that time, the tools jar will be
> deployed
> >>> to Central.
> >>
> >>
> >> If the tools.jar is being deprecated, is something else replacing it? Is
> >> there some other way in which the same thing can be done on 2.2.3?
> >>
> >> Rupert
> >
>
>

Reply via email to