Hi Folks,

Many years ago I had a friend who spent some time telling me about "how
cool" Jini was, but I never really got around to investigating it for
myself at that time. Several years ago I was thinking of a project and
remembered what he sad and read the Jini specs. They struck me as something
that should have been much more successful than they were. They really look
like they solve a lot of key problems, and I started playing a little bit
and decided I probably wanted to use river. However in the way that side
projects often do, it fell victim to work schedules etc. Lately, I've been
reviving the project and now I've got a collaborator and a very rudimentary
0.1 release. The primary concern I've heard every time I mention Jini to
anyone is the perception that it's old, done, yesterday, dying etc. Having
been lurking on this list for the last couple years I can say that releases
still happen and it's "Not Dead Yet" (in my best Monty Python voice) but I
also can't honestly say it's very lively either. Help me counter the nay
sayers :)

I've laid out my reasoning for why it fits with what I want to do in the
link below and I'd like to invite anyone who actually uses Jini regularly
to do any of the following:

   1. Confirm that my concept/ideas/goals fit well with Jini
   2. Tell me I'm crazy and I don't get it :) (nicely)
   3. Say something somewhere in between 1 and 2...
   4. Encourage me to use Jini
   5. Discourage me from using Jini
   6. Propose alternative technologies
   7. *Help me build the **Jini parts of my project* :)

I've started an issue in my Github repository to describe the way I plan to
use Jini and host discussion about pros/cons of this choice so if you're
interested you can find it here: https://github.com/nsoft/jesterj/issues/20

I also hope that if this project succeeds it might serve to re-publicize
jini a bit and bring it back into the attention sphere of some of the
larger open source software community...

Best,

Gus

Reply via email to