No i implement the interface, look at the post to Matthias ones. No i am not using the tiger extension at all yet, so this is not an issue.
Because i have to implement those postBack things i cant say anything useful yet, wheter to keep or not, i am still a little bit confused, about your answers because you are thinking i extends instead of implement ... Have i have to use the 1.0.4 Snapshots? Torsten Am Montag, den 23.10.2006, 19:49 -0700 schrieb Craig McClanahan: > On 10/23/06, Torsten Krah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I've got a question about the postBack methods i have to implement to > > match ViewController interface. > > What should i have to have to implement there - the documentation does > > not mention them, it tells that the methods will be called ( e.g. > > setPotBack(true)) - but a more detailed description why i have to > > implement them would be nice, because every postback my page processes > > ( validation error etc. pp, outcome of the handler is null ), my > > setPostBack method is never called, so to make things clear, why its > > there and how to use it? > > > Separate from Matthias's question about whether you are extending > AbstractViewController instead of implementing ViewController, a separate > question relevant to your scenario is whether or not you're using the @View > annotation from the Tiger Extensions to mark your view controllers. If you > are, then you should be aware that the "postback" property is not > supported. > > As background, I think having the "postback" property might have been a > little bit of overkill in the original API design. One sure way to tell if > you're processing a postback or not is if the preprocess() method gets > called. Thus, the only time (from Shale's perspective) that the application > might really want to know is in the init() method ... and I am moving > towards being convinced that adding the "postback" property just for this > use case is not really the right thing to do. > > What do you think? Is it important enough for a view controller to know > this in the init() method to add full support for the "postback" property, > even when you are using the @View annotation? > > Torsten > > > > > Craig
