> If you want to run JSF 1.2 on Tomcat, you really want 6.0 not 5.5. It >might >be technically feasible to hack together a JSF 1.2 implementation that >would >execute on Tomcat 5.5, but it's hard to see how you could have a completely >spec compliant implementation in the absence of JSP 2.1 (which is part of >Tomcat 6; Tomcat 5 and 5.5 provide JSP 2.0)."
You're right, *I* really want Tomcat 6, but my employers are leery of its beta status. They are also concerned about supporting an additional container. >Just curious ... is this based on a belief that JSF 1.2 + Facelets + Shale >does not work (if it doesn't that is a bug that needs to be fixed), or that >Shale does not provide you anything extra if you have JSF 1.2? I confess >that I don't recall any details of which Shale features you are looking at >from your previous comments ... but there is quite a lot of different >things >available. I didn't explain myself clearly, I'd prefer to use Shale in either case. My problem is that I may be stuck in Tomcat 5.5.17, which (for me) would necessitate using JSF 1.1. I need to decide if yesterday's setup is good enough, or if it's worth pushing my employers really hard to add a Tomcat 6 setup (and risk being thrown out on my rear). E-Mail messages may contain viruses, worms, or other malicious code. By reading the message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full responsibility for taking protective action against such code. Sender is not liable for any loss or damage arising from this message. The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee(s). Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized.
