I think I will rebuild the slf4j project without the Marker functionality and I will deploy it using the NOP implementaion.
Are there any differences between NOP and Simple-Log? Thank you in advance, Kostas On 17/03/06, Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 05:49 PM 3/17/2006, Konstantinos Karadamoglou wrote: > >On 17/03/06, Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you can spare a moment, you could compile SLF4J under JDK 1.1 yourself. > > > It should not be difficult. I could help you if you run into trouble by > > > answering your questions. > > > >I am just checking the source of slf4j and I was wondering that if I > >will change the jdk 1.2 and above classes to jdk 1.1 equivalent then I > >will end up with something incompatible to slf4j library. For > >instance, the Marker interface contains the "iterator" method of type > >iterator. If am going to change that to Enumeration then I am breaking > >the library :( > > To very quickly answer your question, the result might not be exactly the > same as the original SLF4J. However, I believe that in practical terms it > should work in the context of applets. The Marker example should be the > only one affecting the interface instead of implementation. > > > -- > Ceki Gülcü > http://ceki.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > user mailing list > [email protected] > http://slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ user mailing list [email protected] http://slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
