On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Ceki Gulcu <[email protected]> wrote: > > If the redirection code relies only on the org.slf4j.Logger interface, > as I suspect it would, then it could be implemented in SLF4J and > placed within the slf4j-ext module.
OK, I see. > > > I can't think of any concrete reason why the redirection code would > rely on any functionality found in logback-classic beyond what is > offered in slf4j-api. Great. > However, we can't be fully certain of that > assumption as long as there is no implementation of the redirection > code. True :-) Regards Maarten > > > Maarten Bosteels wrote: > >> Ceki, >> >> Doesn't it make more sense to implement this in logback ? >> SLF4J is just a facade with almost no implementation, no ? >> >> Maarten >> >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Ceki Gulcu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> I am curious about why you entered a logback-classic jira issue >> instead of entering a bugzilla bug report for slf4j at >> http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/ >> >> -- > Ceki Gülcü > Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for > Java. > http://logback.qos.ch > _______________________________________________ > user mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >
_______________________________________________ user mailing list [email protected] http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
