Actually, thinking more on this question, Matei: I'd definitely say support
for Avro.  There's a lot of interest in this!!


On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Matei Zaharia <matei.zaha...@gmail.com>wrote:

> BTW one other thing -- in your experience, Diana, which non-text
> InputFormats would be most useful to support in Python first? Would it be
> Parquet or Avro, simple SequenceFiles with the Hadoop Writable types, or
> something else? I think a per-file text input format that does the stuff we
> did here would also be good.
>
> Matei
>
>
> On Mar 18, 2014, at 3:27 PM, Matei Zaharia <matei.zaha...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Diana,
>
> This seems to work without the iter() in front if you just return
> treeiterator. What happened when you didn't include that? Treeiterator
> should return an iterator.
>
> Anyway, this is a good example of mapPartitions. It's one where you want
> to view the whole file as one object (one XML here), so you couldn't
> implement this using a flatMap, but you still want to return multiple
> values. The MLlib example you saw needs Python 2.7 because unfortunately
> that is a requirement for our Python MLlib support (see
> http://spark.incubator.apache.org/docs/0.9.0/python-programming-guide.html#libraries).
> We'd like to relax this later but we're using some newer features of NumPy
> and Python. The rest of PySpark works on 2.6.
>
> In terms of the size in memory, here both the string s and the XML tree
> constructed from it need to fit in, so you can't work on very large
> individual XML files. You may be able to use a streaming XML parser instead
> to extract elements from the data in a streaming fashion, without every
> materializing the whole tree.
> http://docs.python.org/2/library/xml.sax.reader.html#module-xml.sax.xmlreaderis
>  one example.
>
> Matei
>
> On Mar 18, 2014, at 7:49 AM, Diana Carroll <dcarr...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> Well, if anyone is still following this, I've gotten the following code
> working which in theory should allow me to parse whole XML files: (the
> problem was that I can't return the tree iterator directly.  I have to call
> iter().  Why?)
>
> import xml.etree.ElementTree as ET
>
> # two source files, format <data> <country
> name="...">...</country>...</data>
> mydata=sc.textFile("file:/home/training/countries*.xml")
>
> def parsefile(iterator):
>     s = ''
>     for i in iterator: s = s + str(i)
>     tree = ET.fromstring(s)
>     treeiterator = tree.getiterator("country")
>     # why to I have to convert an iterator to an iterator?  not sure but
> required
>     return iter(treeiterator)
>
> mydata.mapPartitions(lambda x: parsefile(x)).map(lambda element:
> element.attrib).collect()
>
> The output is what I expect:
> [{'name': 'Liechtenstein'}, {'name': 'Singapore'}, {'name': 'Panama'}]
>
> BUT I'm a bit concerned about the construction of the string "s".  How big
> can my file be before converting it to a string becomes problematic?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Diana Carroll <dcarr...@cloudera.com>wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Matei.
>>
>> In the context of this discussion, it would seem mapParitions is
>> essential, because it's the only way I'm going to be able to process each
>> file as a whole, in our example of a large number of small XML files which
>> need to be parsed as a whole file because records are not required to be on
>> a single line.
>>
>> The theory makes sense but I'm still utterly lost as to how to implement
>> it.  Unfortunately there's only a single example of the use of
>> mapPartitions in any of the Python example programs, which is the log
>> regression example, which I can't run because it requires Python 2.7 and
>> I'm on Python 2.6.  (aside: I couldn't find any statement that Python 2.6
>> is unsupported...is it?)
>>
>> I'd really really love to see a real life example of a Python use of
>> mapPartitions.  I do appreciate the very simple examples you provided, but
>> (perhaps because of my novice status on Python) I can't figure out how to
>> translate those to a real world situation in which I'm building RDDs from
>> files, not inline collections like [(1,2),(2,3)].
>>
>> Also, you say that the function called in mapPartitions can return a
>> collection OR an iterator.  I tried returning an iterator by calling
>> ElementTree getiterator function, but still got the error telling me my
>> object was not an iterator.
>>
>> If anyone has a real life example of mapPartitions returning a Python
>> iterator, that would be fabulous.
>>
>> Diana
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Matei Zaharia 
>> <matei.zaha...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Oh, I see, the problem is that the function you pass to mapPartitions
>>> must itself return an iterator or a collection. This is used so that you
>>> can return multiple output records for each input record. You can implement
>>> most of the existing map-like operations in Spark, such as map, filter,
>>> flatMap, etc, with mapPartitions, as well as new ones that might do a
>>> sliding window over each partition for example, or accumulate data across
>>> elements (e.g. to compute a sum).
>>>
>>> For example, if you have data = sc.parallelize([1, 2, 3, 4], 2), this
>>> will work:
>>>
>>> >>> data.mapPartitions(lambda x: x).collect()
>>> [1, 2, 3, 4]   # Just return the same iterator, doing nothing
>>>
>>> >>> data.mapPartitions(lambda x: [list(x)]).collect()
>>> [[1, 2], [3, 4]]   # Group together the elements of each partition in a
>>> single list (like glom)
>>>
>>> >>> data.mapPartitions(lambda x: [sum(x)]).collect()
>>> [3, 7]   # Sum each partition separately
>>>
>>> However something like data.mapPartitions(lambda x: sum(x)).collect()
>>> will *not* work because sum returns a number, not an iterator. That's why I
>>> put sum(x) inside a list above.
>>>
>>> In practice mapPartitions is most useful if you want to share some data
>>> or work across the elements. For example maybe you want to load a lookup
>>> table once from an external file and then check each element in it, or sum
>>> up a bunch of elements without allocating a lot of vector objects.
>>>
>>> Matei
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 17, 2014, at 11:25 AM, Diana Carroll <dcarr...@cloudera.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > "There's also mapPartitions, which gives you an iterator for each
>>> partition instead of an array. You can then return an iterator or list of
>>> objects to produce from that."
>>> >
>>> > I confess, I was hoping for an example of just that, because i've not
>>> yet been able to figure out how to use mapPartitions.  No doubt this is
>>> because i'm a rank newcomer to Python, and haven't fully wrapped my head
>>> around iterators.  All I get so far in my attempts to use mapPartitions is
>>> the darned "suchnsuch is not an iterator" error.
>>> >
>>> > def myfunction(iterator): return [1,2,3]
>>> > mydata.mapPartitions(lambda x: myfunction(x)).take(2)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Matei Zaharia <
>>> matei.zaha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Here's an example of getting together all lines in a file as one
>>> string:
>>> >
>>> > $ cat dir/a.txt
>>> > Hello
>>> > world!
>>> >
>>> > $ cat dir/b.txt
>>> > What's
>>> > up??
>>> >
>>> > $ bin/pyspark
>>> > >>> files = sc.textFile("dir")
>>> >
>>> > >>> files.collect()
>>> > [u'Hello', u'world!', u"What's", u'up??']   # one element per line,
>>> not what we want
>>> >
>>> > >>> files.glom().collect()
>>> > [[u'Hello', u'world!'], [u"What's", u'up??']]   # one element per
>>> file, which is an array of lines
>>> >
>>> > >>> files.glom().map(lambda a: "\n".join(a)).collect()
>>> > [u'Hello\nworld!', u"What's\nup??"]    # join back each file into a
>>> single string
>>> >
>>> > The glom() method groups all the elements of each partition of an RDD
>>> into an array, giving you an RDD of arrays of objects. If your input is
>>> small files, you always have one partition per file.
>>> >
>>> > There's also mapPartitions, which gives you an iterator for each
>>> partition instead of an array. You can then return an iterator or list of
>>> objects to produce from that.
>>> >
>>> > Matei
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mar 17, 2014, at 10:46 AM, Diana Carroll <dcarr...@cloudera.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Thanks Matei.  That makes sense.  I have here a dataset of many many
>>> smallish XML files, so using mapPartitions that way would make sense.  I'd
>>> love to see a code example though ...It's not as obvious to me how to do
>>> that as I probably should be.
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks,
>>> > > Diana
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Matei Zaharia <
>>> matei.zaha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > Hi Diana,
>>> > >
>>> > > Non-text input formats are only supported in Java and Scala right
>>> now, where you can use sparkContext.hadoopFile or .hadoopDataset to load
>>> data with any InputFormat that Hadoop MapReduce supports. In Python, you
>>> unfortunately only have textFile, which gives you one record per line. For
>>> JSON, you'd have to fit the whole JSON object on one line as you said.
>>> Hopefully we'll also have some other forms of input soon.
>>> > >
>>> > > If your input is a collection of separate files (say many .xml
>>> files), you can also use mapPartitions on it to group together the lines
>>> because each input file will end up being a single dataset partition (or
>>> map task). This will let you concatenate the lines in each file and parse
>>> them as one XML object.
>>> > >
>>> > > Matei
>>> > >
>>> > > On Mar 17, 2014, at 9:52 AM, Diana Carroll <dcarr...@cloudera.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Thanks, Krakna, very helpful.  The way I read the code, it looks
>>> like you are assuming that each line in foo.log contains a complete json
>>> object?  (That is, that the data doesn't contain any records that are split
>>> into multiple lines.)  If so, is that because you know that to be true of
>>> your data?  Or did you do as Nicholas suggests and have some preprocessing
>>> on the text input to flatten the data in that way?
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Thanks,
>>> > >> Diana
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Krakna H <shankark+...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >> Katrina,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Not sure if this is what you had in mind, but here's some simple
>>> pyspark code that I recently wrote to deal with JSON files.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> from pyspark import SparkContext, SparkConf
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> from operator import add
>>> > >> import json
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> import random
>>> > >> import numpy as np
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> def concatenate_paragraphs(sentence_array):
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> return ' '.join(sentence_array).split(' ')
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> logFile = 'foo.json'
>>> > >> conf = SparkConf()
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> conf.setMaster("spark://cluster-master:7077").setAppName("example").set("spark.executor.memory",
>>> "1g")
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> sc = SparkContext(conf=conf)
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> logData = sc.textFile(logFile).cache()
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> num_lines = logData.count()
>>> > >> print 'Number of lines: %d' % num_lines
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> # JSON object has the structure: {"key": {'paragraphs': [sentence1,
>>> sentence2, ...]}}
>>> > >> tm = logData.map(lambda s: (json.loads(s)['key'],
>>> len(concatenate_paragraphs(json.loads(s)['paragraphs']))))
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> tm = tm.reduceByKey(lambda _, x: _ + x)
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> op = tm.collect()
>>> > >> for key, num_words in op:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>      print 'state: %s, num_words: %d' % (state, num_words)
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Diana Carroll [via Apache Spark
>>> User List] <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> > >> I don't actually have any data.  I'm writing a course that teaches
>>> students how to do this sort of thing and am interested in looking at a
>>> variety of real life examples of people doing things like that.  I'd love
>>> to see some working code implementing the "obvious work-around" you
>>> mention...do you have any to share?  It's an approach that makes a lot of
>>> sense, and as I said, I'd love to not have to re-invent the wheel if
>>> someone else has already written that code.  Thanks!
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Diana
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Nicholas Chammas <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >> There was a previous discussion about this here:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Having-Spark-read-a-JSON-file-td1963.html
>>> > >>
>>> > >> How big are the XML or JSON files you're looking to deal with?
>>> > >>
>>> > >> It may not be practical to deserialize the entire document at once.
>>> In that case an obvious work-around would be to have some kind of
>>> pre-processing step that separates XML nodes/JSON objects with newlines so
>>> that you can analyze the data with Spark in a "line-oriented format". Your
>>> preprocessor wouldn't have to parse/deserialize the massive document; it
>>> would just have to track open/closed tags/braces to know when to insert a
>>> newline.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Then you'd just open the line-delimited result and deserialize the
>>> individual objects/nodes with map().
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Nick
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Diana Carroll <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >> Has anyone got a working example of a Spark application that
>>> analyzes data in a non-line-oriented format, such as XML or JSON?  I'd like
>>> to do this without re-inventing the wheel...anyone care to share?  Thanks!
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Diana
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>>> discussion below:
>>> > >>
>>> http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/example-of-non-line-oriented-input-data-tp2750p2752.html
>>> > >> To start a new topic under Apache Spark User List, email [hidden
>>> email]
>>> > >> To unsubscribe from Apache Spark User List, click here.
>>> > >> NAML
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> View this message in context: Re: example of non-line oriented
>>> input data?
>>> > >> Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archive at
>>> Nabble.com <http://nabble.com/>.
>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>

Reply via email to