how do you recommend building that - it says 
ERROR] Failed to execute goal 
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-assembly-plugin:2.2-beta-5:assembly 
(default-cli) on project spark-0.9.0-incubating: Error reading assemblies: No 
assembly descriptors found. -> [Help 1]
upon runnning 
mvn -Dhadoop.version=2.0.0-cdh4.2.1 -DskipTests clean assembly:assembly


On Apr 1, 2014, at 4:13 PM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Do you get the same problem if you build with maven?
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Vipul Pandey <vipan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> SPARK_HADOOP_VERSION=2.0.0-cdh4.2.1 sbt/sbt assembly 
> 
> That's all I do. 
> 
> On Apr 1, 2014, at 11:41 AM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Vidal - could you show exactly what flags/commands you are using when you 
>> build spark to produce this assembly?
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:53 AM, Vipul Pandey <vipan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Spark now shades its own protobuf dependency so protobuf 2.4.1 should't be 
>>> getting pulled in unless you are directly using akka yourself. Are you?
>> 
>> No i'm not. Although I see that protobuf libraries are directly pulled into 
>> the 0.9.0 assembly jar - I do see the shaded version as well. 
>> e.g. below for Message.class
>> 
>> -bash-4.1$ jar -ftv 
>> ./assembly/target/scala-2.10/spark-assembly-0.9.0-incubating-hadoop2.0.0-cdh4.2.1.jar
>>  | grep protobuf | grep /Message.class
>>    478 Thu Jun 30 15:26:12 PDT 2011 com/google/protobuf/Message.class
>>    508 Sat Dec 14 14:20:38 PST 2013 com/google/protobuf_spark/Message.class
>> 
>> 
>>> Does your project have other dependencies that might be indirectly pulling 
>>> in protobuf 2.4.1? It would be helpful if you could list all of your 
>>> dependencies including the exact Spark version and other libraries.
>> 
>> I did have another one which I moved to the end of classpath - even ran 
>> partial code without that dependency but it still failed whenever I use the 
>> jar with ScalaBuf dependency. 
>> Spark version is 0.9.0
>> 
>> 
>> ~Vipul
>> 
>> On Mar 31, 2014, at 4:51 PM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Spark now shades its own protobuf dependency so protobuf 2.4.1 should't be 
>>> getting pulled in unless you are directly using akka yourself. Are you?
>>> 
>>> Does your project have other dependencies that might be indirectly pulling 
>>> in protobuf 2.4.1? It would be helpful if you could list all of your 
>>> dependencies including the exact Spark version and other libraries.
>>> 
>>> - Patrick
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Vipul Pandey <vipan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'm using ScalaBuff (which depends on protobuf2.5) and facing the same 
>>> issue. any word on this one?
>>> On Mar 27, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Kanwaldeep <kanwal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> > We are using Protocol Buffer 2.5 to send messages to Spark Streaming 0.9 
>>> > with
>>> > Kafka stream setup. I have protocol Buffer 2.5 part of the uber jar 
>>> > deployed
>>> > on each of the spark worker nodes.
>>> > The message is compiled using 2.5 but then on runtime it is being
>>> > de-serialized by 2.4.1 as I'm getting the following exception
>>> >
>>> > java.lang.VerifyError (java.lang.VerifyError: class
>>> > com.snc.sinet.messages.XServerMessage$XServer overrides final method
>>> > getUnknownFields.()Lcom/google/protobuf/UnknownFieldSet;)
>>> > java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
>>> > java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClassCond(ClassLoader.java:631)
>>> > java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:615)
>>> > java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:141)
>>> >
>>> > Suggestions on how I could still use ProtoBuf 2.5. Based on the article -
>>> > https://spark-project.atlassian.net/browse/SPARK-995 we should be able to
>>> > use different version of protobuf in the application.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > View this message in context: 
>>> > http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Using-ProtoBuf-2-5-for-messages-with-Spark-Streaming-tp3396.html
>>> > Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to