That version is old :). We are not forking pig but cleanly separating out pig execution engine. Let me know if you are willing to give it a go.
Also would love to know what features of pig you are using ? Regards Mayur Mayur Rustagi Ph: +1 (760) 203 3257 http://www.sigmoidanalytics.com @mayur_rustagi <https://twitter.com/mayur_rustagi> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Bertrand Dechoux <decho...@gmail.com> wrote: > I saw a wiki page from your company but with an old version of Spark. > > http://docs.sigmoidanalytics.com/index.php/Setting_up_spork_with_spark_0.8.1 > > I have no reason to use it yet but I am interested in the state of the > initiative. > What's your point of view (personal and/or professional) about the Pig > 0.13 release? > Is the pluggable execution engine flexible enough in order to avoid having > Spork as a fork of Pig? Pig + Spark + Fork = Spork :D > > As a (for now) external observer, I am glad to see competition in that > space. It can only be good for the community in the end. > > Bertrand Dechoux > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Mayur Rustagi <mayur.rust...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> We have fixed many major issues around Spork & deploying it with some >> customers. Would be happy to provide a working version to you to try out. >> We are looking for more folks to try it out & submit bugs. >> >> Regards >> Mayur >> >> Mayur Rustagi >> Ph: +1 (760) 203 3257 >> http://www.sigmoidanalytics.com >> @mayur_rustagi <https://twitter.com/mayur_rustagi> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Bertrand Dechoux <decho...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was wondering what was the state of the Pig+Spark initiative now that >>> the execution engine of Pig is pluggable? Granted, it was done in order to >>> use Tez but could it be used by Spark? I know about a 'theoretical' project >>> called Spork but I don't know any stable and maintained version of it. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Bertrand Dechoux >>> >> >> >
