Thanks Eric. I revisited the code, and find  the spreadOutApps option is 
enabled by default with following code:val spreadOutApps = 
conf.getBoolean("spark.deploy.spreadOut", true).
Which I misread it as  val spreadOutApps = 
conf.getBoolean("spark.deploy.spreadOut", false).
Thanks.



bit1...@163.com
 
From: eric wong
Date: 2015-03-14 22:36
To: bit1...@163.com; user
Subject: Re: How does Spark honor data locality when allocating computing 
resources for an application
you seem like not to note the configuration varible "spreadOutApps"

And it's comment: 
  // As a temporary workaround before better ways of configuring memory, we 
allow users to set
  // a flag that will perform round-robin scheduling across the nodes 
(spreading out each app
  // among all the nodes) instead of trying to consolidate each app onto a 
small # of nodes.

2015-03-14 10:41 GMT+08:00 bit1...@163.com <bit1...@163.com>:
Hi, sparkers,
When I read the code about computing resources allocation for the newly 
submitted application in the Master#schedule method,  I got a question about 
data locality:

// Pack each app into as few nodes as possible until we've assigned all its 
cores 
for (worker <- workers if worker.coresFree > 0 && worker.state == 
WorkerState.ALIVE) { 
   for (app <- waitingApps if app.coresLeft > 0) { 
      if (canUse(app, worker)) { 
          val coresToUse = math.min(worker.coresFree, app.coresLeft) 
         if (coresToUse > 0) { 
                val exec = app.addExecutor(worker, coresToUse) 
                launchExecutor(worker, exec) 
                app.state = ApplicationState.RUNNING 
         } 
     } 
  } 
}

Looks that the resource allocation policy here is that Master will assign as 
few workers as possible, so long as these few workers has enough resources for 
the application.
My question is: Assume that the data the application will process is spread on 
all the worker nodes, then the data locality is lost if using the above policy?
Not sure whether I have unstandood correctly or I have missed something.




bit1...@163.com



-- 
王海华

Reply via email to