For records below 50,000 SQL is better right?
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:18 AM, ayan guha <guha.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > With your load, either should be fine. > > I would suggest you to run couple of quick prototype. > > Best > Ayan > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 2:06 PM, vinod kumar <vinodsachin...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Ayan, >> >> I would want to process a data which nearly around 50000 records to 2L >> records(in flat). >> >> Is there is any scaling is there to decide what technology is best?either >> SQL or SPARK? >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 9:40 AM, ayan guha <guha.a...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> It depends on workload. How much data you would want to process? >>> On 9 Jul 2015 22:28, "vinod kumar" <vinodsachin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Everyone, >>>> >>>> I am new to spark. >>>> >>>> Am using SQL in my application to handle data in my application.I have >>>> a thought to move to spark now. >>>> >>>> Is data processing speed of spark better than SQL server? >>>> >>>> Thank, >>>> Vinod >>>> >>> >> > > > -- > Best Regards, > Ayan Guha >
