Did you only partition or also bucket by the join column? Are ORCI indices active i.e. the JOIN keys sorted when writing the files?
Best, Georg Am So., 15. März 2020 um 15:52 Uhr schrieb Manjunath Shetty H < manjunathshe...@live.com>: > Mostly the concern is the reshuffle. Even though all the DF's are > partitioned by same column. During join it does reshuffle, that is the > bottleneck as of now in our POC implementation. > > Is there any way tell spark that keep all partitions with same partition > key at the same place so that during the join it wont do shuffle again. > > > - > Manjunath > ------------------------------ > *From:* ayan guha <guha.a...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Sunday, March 15, 2020 5:46 PM > *To:* Magnus Nilsson <ma...@kth.se> > *Cc:* user <user@spark.apache.org> > *Subject:* Re: Optimising multiple hive table join and query in spark > > Hi > > I would first and foremost try to identify where is the most time spend > during the query. One possibility is it just takes ramp up time for > executors to be available, if thats the case then maybe a dedicated yarn > queue may help, or using Spark thriftserver may help. > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 11:02 PM Magnus Nilsson <ma...@kth.se> wrote: > > Been a while but I remember reading on Stack Overflow you can use a UDF as > a join condition to trick catalyst into not reshuffling the partitions, ie > use regular equality on the column you partitioned or bucketed by and your > custom comparer for the other columns. Never got around to try it out > hough. I really would like a native way to tell catalyst not to reshuffle > just because you use more columns in the join condition. > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 6:04 AM Manjunath Shetty H < > manjunathshe...@live.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > We have 10 tables in data warehouse (hdfs/hive) written using ORC format. > We are serving a usecase on top of that by joining 4-5 tables using Hive as > of now. But it is not fast as we wanted it to be, so we are thinking of > using spark for this use case. > > Any suggestion on this ? Is it good idea to use the Spark for this use > case ? Can we get better performance by using spark ? > > Any pointers would be helpful. > > *Notes*: > > - Data is partitioned by date (yyyyMMdd) as integer. > - Query will fetch data for last 7 days from some tables while joining > with other tables. > > > *Approach we thought of as now :* > > - Create dataframe for each table and partition by same column for all > tables ( Lets say Country as partition column ) > - Register all tables as temporary tables > - Run the sql query with joins > > But the problem we are seeing with this approach is , even though we > already partitioned using country it still does hashParittioning + > shuffle during join. All the table join contain `Country` column with some > extra column based on the table. > > Is there any way to avoid these shuffles ? and improve performance ? > > > Thanks and regards > Manjunath > > > > -- > Best Regards, > Ayan Guha >
