Stephen,
Thank you for the response! Helps out a lot.
So a further question. And forgive my lack of knowledge here, I am not the one
using Storm, only deploying and running it, so I don’t understand all the
reasoning behind why something is done a certain way in Storm.
Let’s say I have deactivated all the topologies. Is it necessary to then kill
the topology? Could I not just wait a set amount of time to ensure the tuples
have cleared, say 5 minutes, and then bring down the nodes?
The reason I ask this is because it is a lot easier to activate the topologies
after the nodes are back up with a non-interactive script. I would like to
avoid using “storm jar” to load the topology because that means I need to hard
code stuff into my scripts or come up with a separate conf file for my script.
See my current code below:
function deactivate_topos {
STORM_TOPO_STATUS=$(storm list | sed -n -e
'/^-------------------------------------------------------------------/,$p' |
sed -e
'/^-------------------------------------------------------------------/d' | awk
'{print $1 ":" $2}')
for i in $STORM_TOPO_STATUS
do
IFS=':' read TOPO_NAME TOPO_STATUS <<< "$i"
echo "$TOPO_NAME $TOPO_STATUS"
if [ $TOPO_STATUS = 'ACTIVE' ]; then
storm deactivate ${TOPO_NAME}
fi
storm list | sed -n -e
'/^-------------------------------------------------------------------/,$p'
done
}
function activate_topos {
STORM_TOPO_STATUS=$(storm list | sed -n -e
'/^-------------------------------------------------------------------/,$p' |
sed -e
'/^-------------------------------------------------------------------/d' | awk
'{print $1 ":" $2}')
for i in $STORM_TOPO_STATUS
do
IFS=':' read TOPO_NAME TOPO_STATUS <<< "$i"
echo "$TOPO_NAME $TOPO_STATUS"
if [ $TOPO_STATUS = 'INACTIVE' ]; then
storm activate ${TOPO_NAME}
fi
storm list | sed -n -e
'/^-------------------------------------------------------------------/,$p'
done
}
From: Stephen Powis [mailto:spo...@salesforce.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 12:45 PM
To: user@storm.apache.org
Subject: Re: Starting and stopping storm
I would imagine the safest way would be to elect to deactivate each running
topology, which should make your spouts stop emitting tuples. You'd wait for
all of the currently processing tuples to finish processing, and then kill the
topology.
If tuples get processed quickly in your topologies, you can effectively do this
by selecting kill and giving it a long enough wait time. IE -- Telling storm
to kill your topology after 30 seconds means it will deactivate your spouts for
30 seconds, waiting for existing tuples to finish getting processed, and then
kill off the topology.
Then bring down each node, upgrade it, bring it back online and resubmit your
topologies.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Garcia-Contractor, Joseph (CORP)
<joseph.garcia-contrac...@adp.com<mailto:joseph.garcia-contrac...@adp.com>>
wrote:
I don't think I got my question across right or I am confused.
Let me break this down in a more simple fashion.
I have a Storm Cluster named "The Quiet Storm" ;) here is what it consists of:
******
Server ZK1: Running Zookeeper
Server ZK2: Running Zookeeper
Server ZK3: Running Zookeeper
Server N1: SupervisorD running Storm Nimbus
Server S1: SupervisorD running Storm Supervisor with 4 workers.
Server S2: SupervisorD running Storm Supervisor with 4 workers.
Server S3: SupervisorD running Storm Supervisor with 4 workers.
******
Now the "The Quiet Storm" can have 1-n number of topologies running on it.
I need to shut down all the servers in the cluster for maintenance. What is
the procedure to do this without doing harm to the currently running topologies?
Thank you,
Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthias J. Sax [mailto:mj...@apache.org<mailto:mj...@apache.org>]
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 12:15 PM
To: user@storm.apache.org<mailto:user@storm.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Starting and stopping storm
Hi,
as always: it depends. ;)
Storm itself clear ups its own resources just fine. However, if the running
topology needs to clean-up/release resources before it is shut down, Storm is
not of any help. Even if there is a Spout/Bolt cleanup() method, Storm does not
guarantee that it will be called.
Thus, using "storm deactivate" is a good way to achieve proper cleanup.
However, the topology must provide some code for it, too. On the call to
Spout.deactivate(), it must emit a special "clean-up" message (that you have to
design by yourself) that must propagate through the whole topology, ie, each
bolt must forward this message to all its output streams. Furthermore, bolts
must to the clean-up if they receive this message.
Long story short: "storm deactivate" before "storm kill" makes only sense if
the topology requires proper cleanup and if the topology itself can
react/cleanup properly on Spout.deactivate().
Using "storm activate" in not necessary in any case.
-Matthias
On 09/28/2015 05:08 PM, Garcia-Contractor, Joseph (CORP) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I am a DevOps guy and I need implement a storm cluster
> with the proper start and stop init scripts on a Linux server. I
> already went through the documentation and it seems simple enough. I
> am using supervisor as my process manager. I am however having a
> debate with one of the developers using Storm on the proper way to
> shutdown Storm and I am hoping that you fine folks can help us out in this
> regard.
>
>
>
> The developer believes that before you tell supervisor
> to kill (SIGTERM) the storm workers, supervisor, and nimbus, you must
> first issue a "storm deactivate topology-name", then tell supervisor
> to kill all the various processes. He believes this because he
> doesn't know if Storm will do an orderly shutdown on SIGTERM and that
> there is a chance that something will get screwed up. This also means
> that when you start storm, after nimbus is up, you need to issue a
> ""storm activate topology-name".
>
>
>
> I am of the belief that because of storms fast fail and
> because it guarantees data processing, none of that is necessary and
> that you can just tell supervisor to stop the process.
>
>
>
> So who is right here?
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -- This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of
> the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and
> confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended
> recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient,
> you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication
> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in
> error, notify the sender immediately by return email and delete the
> message and any attachments from your system.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader
of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, notify the sender immediately by return email and delete the message
and any attachments from your system.
