*@Spico: *The code as promised:
http://nrecursions.blogspot.in/2016/05/more-concepts-of-apache-storm-you-need.html#morecreativetopologystructures
*@Matthias:* Still no luck. I tried this in the bolt code:
Map conf = Utils.readStormConfig();
conf.put("nimbus.leader", "localhost");
Also tried altering the storm.yaml file to have this:
########### These MUST be filled in for a storm configuration
storm.zookeeper.servers:
- "localhost"
# - "server2"
nimbus.seeds: ["localhost"]
Am running this on LocalCluster, and strangely, the storm.yaml file is in
my ~/eclipseworkspace/apache-storm-1.0.0_release/conf/ folder, although my
project is in the ~/eclipseworkspace/MyStorm folder.
Placed a copy of storm.yaml in my project folder and in the build/libs
folder. Still no luck.
For this person
<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/36742451/apache-storm-could-not-find-leader-nimbus-from-seed-hosts>,
it was a port issue. I don't think that's the case for me.
Is there anything else that could be tried out?
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote:
> Utils.readStormConfig() tries to read "./storm.yaml" from local disc
> (ie, supervisor machine that executes the bolt) -- as it is using
> "working-directory" a guess it does not find the file, and thus value
> "nimbus.host" is not set.
>
> Make sure that storm.yaml is found be the worker, or set nimbus.host
> manually in your bolt code:
>
> conf.put("nimbus.host", "<your-nimbus-host-name>");
>
> (or "nimbus.leader" that replaces "nimbus.host" in Storm 1.0.0
>
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 05/09/2016 12:31 PM, Navin Ipe wrote:
> > @Spico: Will share.
> >
> > The streams implementation is working beautifully.
> > Only the topology killing is failing.
> >
> > *Tried:*
> > Map conf = Utils.readStormConfig();
> > NimbusClient cc =
> > NimbusClient.getConfiguredClient(conf);
> > Nimbus.Client client = cc.getClient();
> > client.killTopology("myStorm");
> >
> > *I get these errors:*
> > 29442 [Thread-32-topologyKillerBolt-executor[16 16]] WARN
> > o.a.s.u.NimbusClient - Ignoring exception while trying to get leader
> > nimbus info from localhost. will retry with a different seed host.
> > java.lang.RuntimeException:
> > org.apache.storm.thrift.transport.TTransportException:
> > java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused
> > Caused by: org.apache.storm.thrift.transport.TTransportException:
> > java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused
> > Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused
> > 29445 [Thread-32-topologyKillerBolt-executor[16 16]] ERROR o.a.s.util -
> > Async loop died!
> > java.lang.RuntimeException:
> > org.apache.storm.utils.NimbusLeaderNotFoundException: Could not find
> > leader nimbus from seed hosts [localhost]. Did you specify a valid list
> > of nimbus hosts for config nimbus.seeds?
> > Caused by: org.apache.storm.utils.NimbusLeaderNotFoundException: Could
> > not find leader nimbus from seed hosts [localhost]. Did you specify a
> > valid list of nimbus hosts for config nimbus.seeds?
> > 29462 [Thread-32-topologyKillerBolt-executor[16 16]] ERROR o.a.s.util -
> > Halting process: ("Worker died")
> > java.lang.RuntimeException: ("Worker died")
> >
> > The error is apparently on this line: NimbusClient cc =
> > NimbusClient.getConfiguredClient(conf);
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Spico Florin <spicoflo...@gmail.com
> > <mailto:spicoflo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> > You welcome Navine. I'm also interested in the solution. Can you
> > please share your remarks and (some code :)) after the
> implementation?
> > Thanks.
> > Regards,\
> > Florin
> >
> > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 7:20 AM, Navin Ipe
> > <navin....@searchlighthealth.com
> > <mailto:navin....@searchlighthealth.com>> wrote:
> >
> > @Matthias: That's genius! I didn't know streams and allGroupings
> > could be used like that.
> > In the way Storm introduced tick tuples, it'd have been nice if
> > Storm had a native technique of doing all this, but the ideas
> > you've come up with are extremely good. Am going to try
> > implementing them right away.
> > Thank you too Florin!
> >
> > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Matthias J. Sax
> > <mj...@apache.org <mailto:mj...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >
> > To synchronize this, use an additional "shut down bolt" that
> > used
> > parallelism of one. "shut down bolt" must be notified by all
> > parallel
> > DbBolts after they performed the flush. If all notifications
> are
> > received, there are not in-flight message and thus "shut
> > down bolt" can
> > kill the topology safely.
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> >
> >
> > On 05/08/2016 07:27 PM, Spico Florin wrote:
> > > hi!
> > > there is this solution of sending a poison pill message
> from the
> > > spout. on bolt wil receiv your poison pill and will kill
> topology via
> > > storm storm nimbus API. one potentential issue whith this
> approach is
> > > that due to your topology structure regarding the
> parralelism of your
> > > bolts nd the time required by themto excute their
> bussineess logic, is
> > > that the poison pill to be swallowed by the one bolt
> responsilble for
> > > killing the topology, before all the other messages that
> are in-flight
> > > to be processed. the conseuence is that you cannot be sure
> that all the
> > > messagess sent by the spout were processed. also sharing
> the total
> > > number of sent messages between the excutors in order to
> shutdown when
> > > all messages were processed coul be error prone since
> tuple can be
> > > processed many times (depending on your guaranteee message
> processing)
> > > or they could be failed.
> > > i coul not find a solution for this. storm is intended
> to run
> > > forunbounded data.
> > > i hope that thrse help,
> > > regard,
> > > florin
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sunday, May 8, 2016, Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org
> <mailto:mj...@apache.org>
> > > <mailto:mj...@apache.org <mailto:mj...@apache.org>>>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > You can get the number of bolt instances from
> > TopologyContext that is
> > > provided in Bolt.prepare()
> > >
> > > Furthermore, you could put a loop into your topology,
> > ie, a bolt reads
> > > it's own output; if you broadcast (ie, allGrouping)
> this
> > > feedback-loop-stream you can let bolt instances talk
> > to each other.
> > >
> > > builder.setBolt("DbBolt", new MyDBBolt())
> > > .shuffleGrouping("spout")
> > > .allGrouping("flush-stream", "DbBolt");
> > >
> > > where "flush-stream" is a second output stream of
> > MyDBBolt() sending a
> > > notification tuple after it received the end-of-stream
> > from spout;
> > > furthermore, if a bolt received the signal via
> > "flush-stream" from
> > > **all** parallel bolt instances, it can flush to DB.
> > >
> > > Or something like this... Be creative! :)
> > >
> > >
> > > -Matthias
> > >
> > >
> > > On 05/08/2016 02:26 PM, Navin Ipe wrote:
> > > > @Matthias: I agree about the batch processor, but my
> > superior took the
> > > > decision to use Storm, and he visualizes more
> > complexity later for
> > > which
> > > > he needs Storm.
> > > > I had considered the "end of stream" tuple earlier
> > (my idea was to
> > > emit
> > > > 10 consecutive nulls), but then the question was how
> > do I know how
> > > many
> > > > bolt instances have been created, and how do I
> > notify all the bolts?
> > > > Because it's only after the last bolt finishes
> > writing to DB, that I
> > > > have to shut down the topology.
> > > >
> > > > @Jason: Thanks. I had seen storm signals earlier (I
> > think from one of
> > > > your replies to someone else) and I had a look at
> > the code too,
> > > but am a
> > > > bit wary because it's no longer being maintained and
> > because of the
> > > > issues:
> https://github.com/ptgoetz/storm-signals/issues
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 5:40 AM, Jason Kusar
> > <ja...@kusar.net <mailto:ja...@kusar.net>
> > > <javascript:;>
> > > > <mailto:ja...@kusar.net <mailto:ja...@kusar.net>
> <javascript:;>>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You might want to check out Storm Signals.
> > > > https://github.com/ptgoetz/storm-signals
> > > >
> > > > It might give you what you're looking for.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, May 7, 2016, 11:59 AM Matthias J. Sax
> > > <mj...@apache.org <mailto:mj...@apache.org>
> <javascript:;>
> > > > <mailto:mj...@apache.org
> > <mailto:mj...@apache.org> <javascript:;>>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > As you mentioned already: Storm is designed
> > to run topologies
> > > > forever ;)
> > > > If you have finite data, why do you not use
> > a batch
> > > processor???
> > > >
> > > > As a workaround, you can embed "control
> > messages" in your
> > > stream
> > > > (or use
> > > > an additional stream for them).
> > > >
> > > > If you want a topology to shut down itself,
> > you could use
> > > >
> > >
> >
> `NimbusClient.getConfiguredClient(conf).getClient().killTopology(name);`
> > > > in your spout/bolt code.
> > > >
> > > > Something like:
> > > > - Spout emit all tuples
> > > > - Spout emit special "end of stream"
> > control tuple
> > > > - Bolt1 processes everything
> > > > - Bolt1 forward "end of stream" control
> > tuple (when it
> > > received it)
> > > > - Bolt2 processed everything
> > > > - Bolt2 receives "end of stream" control
> > tuple => flush to DB
> > > > => kill
> > > > topology
> > > >
> > > > But I guess, this is kinda weird pattern.
> > > >
> > > > -Matthias
> > > >
> > > > On 05/05/2016 06:13 AM, Navin Ipe wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I know Storm is designed to run forever. I
> > also know about
> > > > Trident's
> > > > > technique of aggregation. But shouldn't
> > Storm have a way to
> > > > let bolts
> > > > > know that a certain bunch of processing
> > has been completed?
> > > > >
> > > > > Consider this topology:
> > > > > Spout------>Bolt-A------>Bolt-B
> > > > > | |--->Bolt-B
> > > > > | \--->Bolt-B
> > > > > |--->Bolt-A------>Bolt-B
> > > > > | |--->Bolt-B
> > > > > | \--->Bolt-B
> > > > > \--->Bolt-A------>Bolt-B
> > > > > |--->Bolt-B
> > > > > \--->Bolt-B
> > > > >
> > > > > * From Bolt-A to Bolt-B, it is a
> > FieldsGrouping.
> > > > > * Spout emits only a few tuples and then
> > stops emitting.
> > > > > * Bolt A takes those tuples and
> > generates millions of
> > > tuples.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > *Bolt-B accumulates tuples that Bolt A
> > sends and needs
> > > to know
> > > > when
> > > > > Spout finished emitting. Only then can
> > Bolt-B start
> > > writing to
> > > > SQL.*
> > > > >
> > > > > *Questions:*
> > > > > 1. How can all Bolts B be notified that it
> > is time to
> > > write to
> > > > SQL?
> > > > > 2. After all Bolts B have written to SQL,
> > how to know
> > > that all
> > > > Bolts B
> > > > > have completed writing?
> > > > > 3. How to stop the topology? I know of
> > > > > localCluster.killTopology("HelloStorm"),
> > but shouldn't there
> > > > be a way to
> > > > > do it from the Bolt?
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Navin
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Navin
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Navin
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Navin
>
>
--
Regards,
Navin
