This was suggested from someone in mailing list only . I have tested that
already it works .

You can run the old code with the newer version by putting up this config
in storm.yaml of client (machine where you submit the topologies from) -
client.jartransformer.class: "org.apache.storm.hack.StormShadeTransformer"

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Manu Zhang <owenzhang1...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I don't think storm-benchmark can be run against storm 1.0.1 without code
> changes.
> Yes, both computation and communication parts are included. The metrics
> are collected by storm nimbus including end-to-end throughput and latency.
>
> I know nothing more than you on that micro-benchmark. Maybe +
> <http://goog_360245919>ptgo...@gmail.com <+ptgo...@gmail.com> can help
> here.
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 9:10 PM Walid Aljoby <walid_alj...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Manu Zhang,
>>
>> Thank you for your prompt replies.
>>
>> I am using Apache storm 1.0.1. So I don't whether it is feasible to
>> change the version of storm inside pom.xml file of storm-benchmark to
>> 1.0.1. ?
>> Do the metrics you use include both computation and communication parts?
>> Do you have an idea about the implementation of the Benchmarks shown
>> here: Microbenchmarking Apache Storm 1.0 Performance - Hortonworks
>> <http://hortonworks.com/blog/microbenchmarking-storm-1-0-performance/> ?
>> and How is it relative to your own metrics?
>>
>> Sorry for all these questions,
>>
>> Thank you
>> --
>> Regards
>> Walid
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Manu Zhang <owenzhang1...@gmail.com>
>> *To:* Walid Aljoby <walid_alj...@yahoo.com>; "user@storm.apache.org" <
>> user@storm.apache.org>; "d...@storm.apache.org" <d...@storm.apache.org>
>> *Sent:* Monday, July 18, 2016 8:09 PM
>> *Subject:* Re: Storm Benchmarks
>>
>> Hey Walid,
>>
>> storm-benchmark only supports storm 0.9.x for now. Which storm version do
>> you want to run against ?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Manu Zhang
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 7:37 PM Walid Aljoby <
>> walid_alj...@yahoo.com.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Thank you.
>> > You mean that it could not be run with new version of Apache storm?
>> > Regards
>> > Walid
>> >
>> >      From: darion.yaphet <fly...@163.com>
>> >  To: d...@storm.apache.org; Walid Aljoby <walid_alj...@yahoo.com>
>> > Cc: User <user@storm.apache.org>
>> >  Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 6:35 PM
>> >  Subject: Re:Storm Benchmarks
>> >
>> > It seems not found backtype.storm.generated.AlreadyAliveException
>> > .<br/>Because AlreadyAliveException have move to
>> org.apache.storm.generated
>> > At 2016-07-18 18:06:36, "Walid Aljoby" <walid_alj...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
>> > wrote:
>> > >Hi Everyone,
>> > >Anyone used to run Storm Benchmarks in this site:
>> > https://github.com/roshannaik/storm-benchmark-sol ?The compilation was
>> > successful, but I got into error through run time?
>> > >
>> > >.0.1/bin/storm -jar
>> > ./target/storm-benchmark-0.1.0-jar-with-dependencies.jar -conf
>> > ./conf/sol.yaml -c topology.workers=2 storm.benchmark.tools.Runner
>> > storm.benchmark.benchmarks.SOL Running:
>> > /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/bin/java -client -Ddaemon.name=
>> > -Dstorm.options=topology.workers%3D2
>> > -Dstorm.home=/home/jiachen/Desktop/Single-Storm/apache-storm-1.0.1
>> >
>> -Dstorm.log.dir=/home/jiachen/Desktop/Single-Storm/apache-storm-1.0.1/logs
>> > -Djava.library.path=/usr/local/lib:/opt/local/lib:/usr/lib
>> > -Dstorm.conf.file=sol.yaml -cp
>> >
>> /home/jiachen/Desktop/Single-Storm/apache-storm-1.0.1/lib/log4j-slf4j-impl-2.1.jar:/home/jiachen/Desktop/Single-Storm/apache-storm-1.0.1/lib/log4j-api-2.1.jar:/home/jiachen/Desktop/Single-Storm/apache-storm-1.0.1/lib/kryo-3.0.3.jar:/home/jiachen/Desktop/Single-Storm/apache-storm-1.0.1/lib/reflectasm-1.10.1.jar:/home/jiachen/Desktop/Single-Storm/apache-storm-1.0.1/lib/clojure-1.7.0.jar:/home/jiachen/Desktop/Single-Storm/apache-storm-1.0.1/lib/log4j-over-slf4j-1.6.6.jar:/home/jiachen/Desktop/Single-Storm/apache-storm-1.0.1/lib/log4j-core-2.1.jar:/home/jiachen/Desktop/Single-Storm/apache-storm-1.0.1/lib/disruptor-3.3.2.jar:/home/jiachen/Desktop/Single-Storm/apache-storm-1.0.1/lib/objenesis-2.1.jar:/home/jiachen/Desktop/Single-Storm/apache-storm-1.0.1/lib/servlet-api-2.5.jar:/home/jiachen/Desktop/Single-Storm/apache-storm-1.0.1/lib/storm-core-1.0.1.jar:/home/jiachen/Desktop/Single-Storm/apache-storm-1.0.1/lib/minlog-1.3.0.jar:/home/jiachen/Desktop/Single-Storm/apache-storm-1.0.1/lib/storm-rename-hack-1.0.1.jar:/home/jiachen/Desktop/Single-Storm/apache-storm-1.0.1/lib/slf4j-api-1.7.7.jar:/home/jiachen/Desktop/Single-Storm/apache-storm-1.0.1/lib/asm-5.0.3.jar:./target/storm-benchmark-0.1.0-jar-with-dependencies.jar:/home/jiachen/Desktop/Storm-Performance/storm-benchmark/conf:/home/jiachen/Desktop/Single-Storm/apache-storm-1.0.1/bin
>> > -Dstorm.jar=./target/storm-benchmark-0.1.0-jar-with-dependencies.jar
>> > storm.benchmark.tools.Runner storm.benchmark.benchmarks.SOLException in
>> > thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>> > backtype/storm/generated/AlreadyAliveException at
>> > java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method) at
>> > java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2625) at
>> > java.lang.Class.getMethod0(Class.java:2866) at
>> > java.lang.Class.getMethod(Class.java:1676) at
>> > sun.launcher.LauncherHelper.getMainMethod(LauncherHelper.java:494) at
>> >
>> sun.launcher.LauncherHelper.checkAndLoadMain(LauncherHelper.java:486)Caused
>> > by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>> > backtype.storm.generated.AlreadyAliveException at
>> > java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:366) at
>> > java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:355) at
>> > java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at
>> > java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:354) at
>> > java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:425) at
>> > sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:308) at
>> > java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:358) ... 6 more
>> > >
>> > >Thank You
>> > >--
>> > >Regards,
>> > >Walid
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>


-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Anshu Shukla

Reply via email to