Don't have the  logs anymore, I'm afraid. Not much information that could
help debugging, other than it appear to be spending some time trying to
redistribute the existent topologies among the 600 workers (300 *2).
I'll get back to you if I'm able to reproduce the problem.

On 25 June 2017 at 20:42, Erik Weathers <eweath...@groupon.com> wrote:

> 300 is not that many supervisors from my perspective.  Have any of you
> experiencing this issue dug in to see what's slowing it down?
>
> - Erik
>
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 1:48 AM Rui Abreu <rui.ab...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 22 June 2017 at 19:35, Erik Weathers <eweath...@groupon.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Sounds like you've hit some scaling bottleneck with Storm.  I've never
>>> tried running nearly that number of topologies.
>>> It might be an inefficiency with the number of API calls, or with the
>>> interactions between the Nimbus and ZooKeeper.
>>>
>>
>>
>> A similar situation occurs on Storm 1.1.0 when the number of supervisors
>> approaches 300 (2 workers per supervisor). Storm UI fails to load because
>> /api/vi/{supervisor,topology, nimbus} calls timeout.
>>
>

Reply via email to