Yeah, it is a bug. can open an Pull Request Kang? On 2013年12月21日, at 上午2:20, 肖康(Kang Xiao) <[email protected]> wrote:
> It seems that PR #547 is modified before it's merged to upstream. @nathan, is > it a bug? > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-storm/commits/master/storm-core/src/clj/backtype/storm/timer.clj > > > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 2:08 AM, 肖康(Kang Xiao) <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, it's truncated. The code is as follows. > > (* 1000 (long delay-secs))) > https://github.com/apache/incubator-storm/blob/master/storm-core/src/clj/backtype/storm/timer.clj#L85 > > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Antonio Verardi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have already asked this question in the dev mailing list, but no one > answered. Maybe I'll be more lucky here. Sorry for the spam. > > I noticed that Storm 0.9.0 allows to set tick tuple frequencies at the > millisecond level: > https://github.com/nathanmarz/storm/pull/547 > > However, I tried to use the feature, but, even though the config seems to > show the floating point value I specified (3.9 for example), the tick tuple > seems to be generated every truncate(float_value) (in this case, every 3 > seconds). > > Does anyone have experienced the same issue? Should I open an issue on Apache > JIRA? > > > > -- > Best Regards! > > 肖康(Kang Xiao,<[email protected]>) > Distributed Software Engineer > > > > -- > Best Regards! > > 肖康(Kang Xiao,<[email protected]>) > Distributed Software Engineer
