I am also interested in how can you make the storm be connected with HDFS?
have you modified the lib from storm? can you guys roughly describe the
steps?
thanks

2014-09-10 0:16 GMT-04:00 Jiang Jacky <jiang0...@gmail.com>:

> the best solution is that we can add the multiple nimbus server in the
> storm.yaml, those should be for failover, it also will be easy to configure
>
> 2014-09-09 22:19 GMT-04:00 潘臻轩 <zhenxuan...@gmail.com>:
>
> yes, I have implement this way.. and it ok in fact..
>> I implement a total ha solution for nimbus.
>> and our team write a total scheduler for storm(such as yarn for support
>> 700+ cluster)
>>
>> 2014-09-10 10:02 GMT+08:00 Ankit Toshniwal <ankitoshni...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Yes, that's a problem area, and we have been discussing it internally on
>>> how we can handle it better. We are considering moving to an HDFS based
>>> solution where Nimbus will upload the jars into hdfs instead of local disk
>>> (as that is a single point of failure) and supervisors will be downloading
>>> the jar's from hdfs as well.
>>>
>>> The other problem we ran into was nic saturation on Nimbus host since
>>> too many machines were doing copy of the jar's (180MB in size) to worker
>>> machines leading to the total increase in time. Thus, with moving to HDFS
>>> based solution we can do this more effectively and faster plus it scales
>>> better.
>>>
>>>  We do not have a working prototype for it, but something we are
>>> actively pursuing.
>>>
>>> Ankit
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:43 PM, 潘臻轩 <zhenxuan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I not agree Nathan, if just nimbus down, it is fail-fast.but if the
>>>> machine happen error(such as disk error), this may lead
>>>> topology clear.
>>>>
>>>> 2014-09-10 9:39 GMT+08:00 潘臻轩 <zhenxuan...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> *According to my knowledge, is not the case。you should check it with
>>>>> script or other way.*
>>>>>
>>>>> 2014-09-10 0:49 GMT+08:00 Jiang Jacky <jiang0...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi, I read the articles about the nimbus, it specifies the nimbus
>>>>>> daemon is fail-fast. But I am not sure if it is like Hadoop, there is
>>>>>> secondary server for failover, if the nimbus server is totally down, then
>>>>>> the secondary server can be up. Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to