Matthias-

I had most of the struts-cfg changes you mention, because they came in the 
struts-faces docs.

Maybe my problem is my JSTL knowledge (surely it is, the question is, "Is it 
now?").

Maybe if it iss just easier if I explain what I am trying to accomplish.

I have List of Objects that I want to forEach on and provide input into each 
Object's properties. Both the List and it's component Objects are declared as 
Dynabeans in Struts-Config. I have a feeling that the component object is the 
hangup here since there's nothing to my knowledge saying, "Yo! It's a 
dynabean!" to JSF.

Once I get that working (or maybe not if that concept is flawed, it's not the 
actual goal, it's just an analog of what I was doing without JSF), I'd 
instead want to populate the List with the actual object I got out of the 
database via hibernate. Let the user modify that (complete with it's non-
string properties), and resave it.

Once I get this "proof of concept" working, I should be soooo off and 
running...

TIA

-Joe


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 4:27 AM
> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: DynaBeans with struts faces [Was Right Back in 
> My Struts Face]
> 
> 
> Hi Joe,
> 
> the thing with <f:view> was noticed in the "online" 
> release-notes that where shiped with the beta.(not more 
> online, i guess) In Early_Access_X there where the 
> <f:use_faces>-Tag. however, you must add the following to 
> struts-cfg.xml: <controller>
>   <set-property property="inputForward" value="true"/>
>   <set-property property="processorClass"
>  
> value="org.apache.struts.faces.application.FacesTilesRequestPr
> ocessor"/>
> </controller>
> note, i use the tiles-candidate for supporting tiles in my 
> jsf-sturts-apps there is also a FacesRequestProcessor-class
> 
> the dynaBeans are supported via struts-faces.jar.
> The class "PropertyResolverImpl" decorates the default 
> PropertyResolver shiped with implementation you use : RI, 
> MyFAces,... (decorator-pattern //Gamma//)
> 
> the value of field 'id' has the restrictions:
> -Must not be a zero-length String
> -First character must be a letter or an underscore ('_') 
> -Subsequent characters must be a letter, a digit, an 
> underscore ('_'), or a dash ('-')
> 
> so no dot ('.')
> 
> and use #{} instead of ${}
> 
> 
> hope that helps you.
> 
> :)
> Cheers,
> Matthias
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Hertz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 4:43 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: DynaBeans with struts faces [Was Right Back in My 
> Struts Face]
> 
> 
> James-
> 
> Thank you. I had already grabbed faces-console, but many of 
> those links 
> actually had (more) current examples. Still there's nothing 
> explicit that 
> would make one realize f:view replaced f:use_faces, but I 
> figured it out.
> 
> Is there anything special I need to do to use a struts-config defined 
> DynaBean inside of JSF? The struts-faces examples have one 
> dynabean declared, 
> but if you look in the corresponding class, it turns out not 
> to be a DynaBean 
> after all (story of my life).
> 
> The following snippet bombs, claiming it can't find the items 
> property of 
> MaintenanceListForm, which is definitely there in the struts-config.
> 
> TIA
> 
> -Joe
> 
> <c:forEach var="item" items="${MaintenanceListForm.items}">
> <tr><td><h:inputHidden id="item.id" value="${item.id}"/> 
> <h:inputText id="item.creditCost" size="5" maxlength="5" 
> value="# {item.creditCost}"/> </td> <td><h:inputText 
> id="item.minPurchase" size="6" maxlength="6" value="# 
> {item.minPurchase}"/> </td> <td><h:selectOneListbox 
> id="item.currency">
>   <f:selectItem itemValue="USD" />
>   <f:selectItem itemValue="CAD" />
>   <f:selectItem itemValue="EUR" />
>   <f:selectItem itemValue="JPY" />
>   </h:selectOneListbox>
> </td>
> <td><h:inputText id="item.beginDate" 
> value="${item.beginDate}"/> </td> <td><h:inputText 
> id="item.endDate" value="${item.endDate}" /></td></tr> </c:forEach>
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 8:42 AM
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [OT-rant] Right Back in My Struts Face
> > 
> > 
> > Joe,
> > 
> > My guess is that you are trying to make a pre-1.0 example work with 
> > the 1.0 Final release of JSF.  In most scenarios, that will 
> not work 
> > because there have been significant changes to JSF throughout its 
> > release cycle. I would suggest trying out another example 
> application
> > instead of the one you're working with.  You can find several 
> > tutorials on my websiate at:
> > 
> > http://www.jamesholmes.com/JavaServerFaces/
> > 
> > You may also want to try posting issues like this to the JSF forum:
> > 
> > http://forum.java.sun.com/forum.jsp?forum=427
> > 
> > Hope that helps,
> > 
> > James
> > http://www.jamesholmes.com/
> > 
> > >
> > >
> > > I picked up JSF today, never having touched JSF in the 
> first place.
> > >
> > > So far, struts faces seems fine, but as far as the JSF1.0 
> Reference 
> > > goes, I am...well..it's easier to show you.
> > >
> > > My experience went something like this.
> > >
> > > Jasper can't find the <f:use_faces> tag. Hmmm. This is kind of a 
> > > critical thing, so I'm lead to believe. Try to find what I
> > did wrong.
> > > No joy. Googling doesn't mention this gotcha. Neither does the 
> > > Kurniawan book on JSF. Release notes don't mention it. 
> Must not be 
> > > finding the taglibs???
> > Nope. Maybe
> > > they
> > > camelized it like some of the other tags and forgot to say
> > so? Nope. After
> > > double and triple checking myself, I look into the taglibs
> > themselves.
> > > Whoa --
> > >  It's really not there! Hoookay...so I check the struts
> > faces examples.
> > > and
> > > sure enough, it is not used there either. Must be gone...
> > Failing that, if
> > > Craig doesn't need it, neither do I. Huzzah...I think. So I
> > crib off of
> > > the
> > > examples. Obviously the docs aint current at all...I
> > think/hope/wonder.
> > >
> > > Then I find a number of tags have changed ever so slightly,
> > but that I
> > > had found in the release note
> > > 
> > (http://java.sun.com/j2ee/javaserverfaces/docs/ReleaseNotes.ht
> ml) even 
> > though the link to the README file is 404.
> >
> > So, with my newly found faith in the release notes and book 
> I bought, 
> > I continue using "the braille system" to get a compile. Lo, more 
> > discoveries. Am I to understand that <h:input_date> ^H^H^H^H^H
> > inputDate> is gone too????
> > As is <h:input_n^H^HNumber>?? I kinda thought they were the point
> > here... Guess I have to use <h:input_text> and use a converter?? I 
> > guess. Maybe. Or do I? No amount of googling is providing 
> me an answer
> 
> > about this either, and
> > this time the best source of documentation I have (the struts faces
> > examples)
> > don't have a case where non-text input it gathered from the user.
> >
> > I'm not as annoyed as I sound (not much anyway), but it's quite 
> > frustrating to have this happen when you really did RTFM -- Lots of 
> > them.
> >
> > Watch it turn out to all be documented some place obvious I didn't 
> > think to look...
> >
> > -Joe
> >
> >
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to