> <%-- Nested tag way Notice how much less to write out--%> > > <nested:iterate property="divisions"> > Division: <nested:text property="name" /><br> > <nested:iterate property="departments"> > --- Department: <nested:text property="name" /><br> > </nested:iterate> > </nested:iterate>
Thanks for the code snippet Rick. It helped trim down a lot of code. Whenever I would try and submit the form I was getting BeanUtil.populate errors. I tracked down this email from November 2002: http://tinyurl.com/26w69 " > <VERY-IMPORTANT> > if I set the action scope="request" I get: > javax.servlet.ServletException: BeanUtils.populate > ... > Caused by: java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 2, Size: 0 > or > Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException > > make sure you don't have scope="request" in your <action ... </action> > </VERY-IMPORTANT> " Do you _have_ to put forms that use nested beans in session scope? Using your example, my getters/setters would look something like: public void setDivisions(Divisions[] divisions) { this.divisions = divisions; } public Divisionsa[] getDivisions() { return this.divisions; } On my action, having scope="request" would cause problems. Changing that to scope="session" solved the problem. Do you know of a way I can avoid storing the ActionForm in the session? I've caught a few references to Common's LazyList (page was formatted correctly in Google cache under Mozilla 1.7 but not when the original url was clicked on): http://tinyurl.com/yqot7 Should I declare this.divisions to be some sort of List or LazyList instead of Divisions[]? Is any of this making sense? Thanks, Ron --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
