> -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Duffy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 10:45 AM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: some best practices questions > > > What do you think of caching static or semi-static data that > applies to all users (options in a > drop down list, etc.) in the application scope?
I think it depends on how much memory all your ddl and other type stuff is. That's what application scope is for, anythinng that should be application wide. > > --- Vic Cekvenich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My comment would be that *data* caching should be done in > the data layer > > (like ibatis, hibrenate, whatever). > > .V > > > > Pilgrim, Peter wrote: > > >>-----Original Message----- > > >>From: Michael McGrady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>Sent: 08 July 2004 09:14 > > >>To: Struts Users Mailing List > > >>Subject: RE: some best practices questions > > >> > > >> > > >>At 12:36 AM 7/8/2004, you wrote: > > >> > > >>>For this particular use case I would either just use the > session, or > > >>>alternatively I would just look up the dropdowns from db > > >> > > >>each time and > > >> > > >>>accept the performance hit, but its (probably) not worth the > > >> > > >>development > > >> > > >>>time - including ongoing maintenance - to do anything overly > > >> > > >>tricky just for > > >> > > >>>a few dropdowns. > > >>> > > >>>my 2c > > >> > > >>The thing is, though, Andrew, these are recurrent issues > and seem to > > >>require a generic solution. Having a small manager in > > >>application scope > > >>which can create and monitor a scope which is not > > >>application, not session, > > >>and not request, is worth the while for these recurrent > problems, I > > >>think. The persistence of such a scope can be made a > > >>function of the data > > >>rather than the interest of the clients. That is worth > > >>having to use on a > > >>general basis, I think, and can be done with a very small > performance > > >>hit. In fact, my guess is that it would be a performance plus. > > >> > > >>Michael > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > Well this is astounding, because I looking at JCache JSR whatever? > > > and looking at alternatives like OSCache for a caching the look up > > > of login user accounts. So where the hell is JCache or > the standard. > > > > > > If it was there, I think it would give you what you want? > > > > > > -- > > > Peter Pilgrim > > > Operations/IT - Credit Suisse First Boston, > > > 10 South Colonnade, London E14 4QJ, United Kingdom > > > Tel: +44 (0)207 883 4447 > > > > > > > ============================================================== > ================ > > > This message is for the sole use of the intended > recipient. If you received > > > this message in error please delete it and notify us. If > this message was > > > misdirected, CSFB does not waive any confidentiality or > privilege. CSFB > > > retains and monitors electronic communications sent > through its network. > > > Instructions transmitted over this system are not binding > on CSFB until they > > > are confirmed by us. Message transmission is not > guaranteed to be secure. > > > > ============================================================== > ================ > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
