Full-stack GUIs. IMO jQuery is better for minor ajaxification of apps. For strong GUI needs I'd lean towards more complete, pre-packaged solutions rather than trying to mash jQueryUI things together, which can be painful at times.
Dave On Aug 16, 2011 1:10 PM, "Christian Grobmeier" <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: > Out of curiosity. > What are the criteria which speak for Dojo, in your opinion? > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Dave Newton <davelnew...@gmail.com> wrote: >> jQuery. >> >> Dave >> On Aug 16, 2011 1:01 PM, "Balwinder" <balwinder....@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Dave, >>> >>> My criteria is: >>> >>> Able to ajaxify my app seamlessly. >>> Quick in implementation. >>> Ease of maintenance. >>> Quick to learn. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Balwinder Kumar >>> >>> On 8/16/2011 10:26 PM, Dave Newton wrote: >>>> What are your criteria? >>>> >>>> IMO they're different things, Dojo is more of an app framework, although >>>> there's overlap in functionality at the low level. >>>> >>>> Dave >>>> On Aug 16, 2011 12:38 PM, "Balwinder"<balwinder....@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> >>>>> Can any one suggest, for ajax which framework is better? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Balwinder Kumar >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org >>>>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org >>> >> > > > > -- > http://www.grobmeier.de > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org >
