Sorry for a late reply :( pt., 20 sty 2023 o 02:28 Kris O'Neil <kris.on...@petrosys.com.au> napisał(a):
> > Does it mean you have something else on top of the stack than action? > The original action, held in the background process, is at the top of the > stack. This is the object we want returned when "JSONResult.findRootObject" > is called. The second object in the stack is the action created by the > polling request to get a progress update. The change in 6.0.0 to call > 'stack.findValue("#action")' returns the second object in the stack. As the > polling action is never executed and instead delegated to the background > progress, there's no data returned by the second action i.e. no progress > information. I wonder why stack.findValue("#action") returns the second action not the top action, I need to investigate this > > If this is a ModelDriven it should be fine as well as there is a code to > > detect that. > I have changed my action to implement ModelDriven to get around the code > change to JSONResult. If this is now a requirement of using the > ExecuteAndWaitInterceptor, the documentation may need to be updated - > https://struts.apache.org/core-developers/execute-and-wait-interceptor No, it shouldn't be, I would say it's rather a recommendation to use ModelDriven instead of action itself. As far as I understand, by implementing ModelDriven you don't have to specify the "root" object in the JSON result as ModelDriven is used directly, right? > >> Workaround: > >> Changing the action to implement 'ModelDriven' reinstates the old > >> behaviour of calling 'stack.peek()' in the JSONResult.findRootObject(...) > >> method. > > Thanks, but what else can it be? > Ideally, the action from the background process would be returned by > "JSONResult.findRootObject" without the need for the action to implement > ModelDriven. Could the ExecuteAndWaitInterceptor add the action to the > context with the key 'action'? I'm not sure if there would be other > implications of changing the action in this way. I will try to dig into that, I understand your concern Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org