Frank, On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:03:32 -0400 (EDT), Frank W. Zammetti (MLists) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip>
> I find the bigger debate, which there was a thread about a day or two ago, > is how you actually package it... Do you just have a single package for > all your actions or do you sub-group the Actions into individual packages? > Even with the 400 Action project, I like seeing them all in one package > myself, but it's certainly a debatable point. i was following that thread. i'm surprised it didn't carry. i was curious to see how it played out as well. i'm currently packaging via functionality. so: com.company.project.inventory.action com.company.project.inventory.forms etc. but at the moment i'm just trying to convert this app over to Struts and i'm working on one functional area at a time. once i get one completed we'll re-evalute and determine if the rest of the team will join in and Strutify the rest of the app. i currently have four packages within my functional package. rough guess there are about 10 functional areas in the app. (User, Customer, Inventory...) if i was building this app from scratch using Struts i'm not sure if i would have packaged it the same way. but this method works well for adaption. andy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
