<snip> On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 18:51:35 -0600, Will Stranathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If I remember the same thread, I think the thrust of the argument was > that JSP belongs under WEB-INF because it's TEMPLATE artifacts, NOT > web artifacts. However, images and javascripts, unless you have a > custom servlet or Struts action to retrieve those artifacts, would NOT > belong under WEB-INF - those are specific to presentation. </snip>
Where you put the files, Will, has little, I think, to do with any architecture. Rather, the issue is accessibility. If you want only programmatic accessibility, you want to do something to ensure that a URL cannot reach your assets. These assets can be anything: images, a phone book, JSP pages, etc. I put everything there. No reason not to in my case. Jack -- ------------------------------ "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ "You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep." ~Native Proverb~ "Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to be crows." ~Hunkesni (Sitting Bull), Hunkpapa Sioux~ ----------------------------------------------- "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation." --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
