On Feb 01, 2005, at 21:16, Larry Meadors wrote:
HAHAHAH! I just inherited some code with a pile of inner classes, and I have to say I agree with you on that "sorry freak of nature" comment. Still not sure I dig static ICs, but am willing to give them the benefit of the doubt...for now.
Static inner class is perhaps a misnomer, as they get tainted by associations with their degenerated cousins, the "inners".
In a nutshell, static don't share anything with their enclosing class except being in the same source file. Think of them more in terms of "packaging" then "semantic".
Cheers
-- PA, Onnay Equitursay http://alt.textdrive.com/
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
