DW
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Beal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <user@struts.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: URL pattern for validation
I ended up getting curious, so rather than just speculate, I dug into both RFC's, it looks like I was wrong. According to the both RFC's (1738 and 3986) the '/' is not required for an empty path in a URL/URI. Sorry, Daniel, no help here.
-- Jeff
Craig McClanahan wrote:On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 13:13:19 -0500, Jeff Beal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think that, strictly speaking, a URL needs at least the first '/' in the path portion. Have you tried http://www.maintainfit.com/ ? When in doubt, check the RFC: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1738.html
FYI, there are more recent standards documents than RFC 1738 around the syntax of URLs and URIs ... in particular you'll want to review the following document:
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3986.html
for the latest updates.
-- Jeff
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]