On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 12:27, Shey Rab Pawo wrote: > <SNIP> > On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:40:13 -0500, Mike Millson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 10:22, Tim Christopher wrote: > > > So what you're saying is that if I include a separate DTO it doesn't > > > really achieve anything extra - whilst at the same time creating more > > > code to maintain and reducing performance? > > > > Yes, that's what I think. > </SNIP> > > If you are in a J2EE environment and are looking at multiple remote > calls, DTO/VOs make a lot of sense. Please note that DTO/VOs can be > used in composite objects which are really helpful in J2EE > environments. You may not have that sort of environment. > > If you don't, then the usefulness of DTO/VO depends.
That's a good point. I was definitely not thinking of a J2EE environment, but a POJO environment. Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
