In fact I did know that :) As far as the records go, I just can't stop thinking though that if the rules weren't in place when they were set, I just can't bring myself to have a problem with them. So the McGwires and Sosas of the world, in my mind, get a pass. The interesting case is Bonds though. But, even there, until there is actual evidence, being a big believer in the basic tenet of our legal system that says innocent until proven guilty, I can't have a problem with him either. Suspicions aren't enough to put an asterisk next to anything. I don't know... you raise a fair point about the need for oversight, but I still have a more negative impression of our congress spending time, effort and money on this than the myriad other things that are so much more important.

Oh gee, did we veer off topic here?? ;)

--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com

Dakota Jack wrote:
As a baseball nut, those records are sacrosanct to me and I just hate
the idea of a record being the product of drugs.  I am all for the
oversight.  This is especially so since baseball enjoins a monopoly
because it is the officially recognized pastime.  Did you know that?

Jack


On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:57:46 -0500, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I frankly view Tiles as one of those things that *can* be nice in some
cases, but more often than not just complicates matters.  After all, it
is just the JSP include mechanism on steroids, and as we all saw today,
steroids are bad, mmmkay??

:)

Argh... I love Baseball, have all my life, used to play from sunrise to
sunset during the summers of my youth, but is there really no more
pressing matters in this country for our elected representatives to be
dealing with than steroid abuse in a sport??  I don't want my son to
think it's OK to juice any more than any other parent, but come on, do
we really need the expense of a senate hearing meant to do little else
than embarass players and the time wasted from dealing with what are
numerous clearly more important matters??

Sorry, had to vent :)

Frank

Leon Rosenberg wrote:

An example...

I have an application where there are six screens.  They are
used to create a record in the database.  When used this way,
they do in fact represent a wizard-type flow.  However, you
can also recall the items from the database for editing, and
the same screens are used, but, you now have the capability
to jump between screens any way you wish.  The same screens,
and more importantly ACTIONS, are no longer used in the usual
flow.  If I had did what amounts to hardcoded that flow into
the Actions by having one depent on another, I wouldn't be
able (easily) to accomplish that.

You might say this is now a fringe case, and certainly it is
less common than the example I gave before, but it still is
not unusual (at least as far as my travels go :) )



Ok, makes sense. I have never had that sort of requirement/solution before,
but it sounds feasible.
To me, it sounds a bit like you'd need tiles :-), but the
multi-form-processing-thingy would probably do it too :-)

However, i'll wait till ist ready, see the result, and try to learn :-)

Regards
Leon



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




.


-- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex Technologies http://www.omnytex.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]









---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to