Hey, Simon! Good to see you are still kickin' I see the morons around this list are as gullible to my posts as ever....
muhahahaha.... ~mark (a REAL programmer) -----Original Message----- From: Simon Chappell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 2:49 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: Is there any Jsp template like Smarty template ? On 6/29/05, Yan Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Maybe IDEs are helpful, > It is not "Maybe" that IDEs are useful. It is that they are definiately > useful. Under certain circumstances they are useful. I am fully of the opinion that no beginner should ever be allowed to use an IDE. IDEs are an inhibitor of learning and understanding and should only be used by experienced programmers who have already gotten the necessary concepts full groked. > > but if you can't do your programming in a > > straight text editor, you shouldn't be programming at all. > When you programm in a text editor, you may very likely to have snytax errors. A small price to pay and a problem that the compiler will catch for us. The java lib is so > huge you can not possiably remember every single method name correctly. For > example, you should > have object.toString and you accidently wrote object.tostrig. You would catch > this kind of errors Again, the compiler will catch it. And for the standard library, that's why they invented documentation, such as either the Java Almanacs or the standard JavaDoc for the JDK. > in realy time due to code inspection on the fly in an IDE. In a text editor, > you would catch it > when you compile it or rely on your eyes(Your eyes work well when you are > young and That is one of > the reasons why we use Junit.. right? . Does it mean you do not know how to > program? I use JUnit because I give a rip about writing quality code that I can prove the quality of, not because of the lack or otherwise of an IDE. > > auto-generate some code (mostly awful code) but that's about it. > If that is all the person("should not even be called "programmer") knows, he > is not supposed to be > hired in the first place. Auto code generation should be used only for very > tedious boilerplate > code such as getters and setters... Most autogenerated code is less programmer friendly than it could be, it's purpose being to be easily created rather than read and maintained. Simon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ******************************************************************************************************************* This email and any file transmitted with it may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this email in error please notify the DBM Service Desk by forwarding this message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email has been scanned by networkMaryland Antivirus Service for the presence of computer viruses. ******************************************************************************************************************* This email and any file transmitted with it may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this email in error please notify the DBM Service Desk by forwarding this message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email has been scanned by networkMaryland Antivirus Service for the presence of computer viruses. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]