I probably should not respond, but obviously I could not stop myself from doing so.. 1: How sure can we be that Mark wrote the message about him being fired over this 2: If he did write this, AND the message is true, it seems far fetched that one gets fired over just posting in this thread (although his style is far from respectable) 3: His actions in this forum (as far as I experienced it last week) is likely to trigger others to do something about it.. So he kinda brought it upon himself by provoking a maillist that should be far from name calling and showing lots of disrepect to many of us.. It should be a technical forum on the use of struts. Mark clearly violated several ethics with almost, if not all, of his posts... 4: Maybe he was not allowed to use Intenet during business hours..... 5: Yes if this is the sole reason for him being fired, it is a bit over the top and the one who sent the thread summary to his director probably should not have done that. On the other hand, Mark is part of a public function and therefor has to answer to the public and therefor should have highg value of ethics.. His clear way of violating such ethics mgith be reason enough to have distrust in his addition to his public function, which kinda would make it a public's problem.. 6: bad carma?
To make a long story short: he would not have anything to worry form this thread if he simply would have been polite and respectfull... Just my two cents... -----Original Message----- From: Larry Meadors [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 6 juli 2005 18:07 To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: M Galbreath I would like the person who sent this to know that they are the lowest form of life on the planet. Larry On 7/6/05, netsql <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We all all sincererly very sorry, we just wanted a slap on the wrist > from all the noise. > > .V > > > Mark Galbreath wrote: > > Thanks to whomever emailed last weeks nonsense thread to the > > Director of the Board of Elections. It made me look like a racist > > and I was fired this morning. The State is also looking into > > whether my use of an official email address for that discussion is > > in violation of state law. You did your work well, you low-life > > bastard. > > > > Signing off.... > > Mark > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------------------------------------------------------- ATTENTION: The information in this electronic mail message is private and confidential, and only intended for the addressee. Should you receive this message by mistake, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or use of this message is strictly prohibited. Please inform the sender by reply transmission and delete the message without copying or opening it. Messages and attachments are scanned for all viruses known. If this message contains password-protected attachments, the files have NOT been scanned for viruses by the ING mail domain. Always scan attachments before opening them. ----------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
