No is the answer. On 7/22/05, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > >I presume you're referring to the fact that Michael Jouravlev's flavour of > >DispatchAction uses the ".x" and ".y" suffixes which HTML appends to image > >button parameters to determine the method to execute as being "code > >purloined from Michael McGrady"? (If not, then what?) > > > > > No offense to anybody, but hasn't everybody had to deal with this issue > in one way or another if they've used images as buttons? > > >P.S. Are we still pretending that Dakota Jack and Michael McGrady are not > >the same person? > > > > > I've been pretending that neither of them are people; much quicker. > > Dave > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
