Good Morning Tamas
Are you saying that Bean should not extend Object?
1)If so is there another way that Bean could support reflection without
extending Object?
2)If so if that hurdle could be overcome How would the Bean support the
equals method?
Martin-
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tamas Szabo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 3:35 AM
Subject: [OT] org.apache.commons.beanutils.PropertyUtils.describe(Object )
Hi,
it seems to you ok that the
org.apache.commons.beanutils.PropertyUtils.describe(Object )
method puts the class property(coming from java.lang.Object) in the map?
I'm not sure about this, but it would be more logical for me if the class
was not in the Map(if it was not handled as a normal property).
I mean when I write a bean I declare all of the properties I want to
consider properties.
But because all the beans extend Object, I also get Object's properties.
It just doesn't seems right to me :-)
Tamas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
