On 8/5/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you for the detailed reply, Craig. The reason I was hesitating going > whole hog into Shale was I was worried the functionality of Struts that I > have gotten used to may still be in an incumbent stage in Shale. However > since you state that JSF+Shale "has pretty much all the functional > features Struts 1.x" does (and more besides!), I guess this means you are > endorsing Shale's maturity (or features anyway).... Ok, I guess I know > what I will doing this weekend..:) >
I'm definitely endorsing Shale's feature set. As for its maturity, we are only now shaking down for a 1.0.0 milestone release (essentially an alpha) -- and I don't expect to get to a level of stability of APIs, or robustness/correctness of behavior, for at least a couple rounds of that. But it is certainly suitable for exploration and bleeding edge folks to look at today. This (Shale) is where I spend all of *my* open source time these days ... > Thanks again! > Geeta > Craig --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
