Ok, Looks like at least a few other people have found Struts guilty here. I have found a existing bug report 23372 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23372 that deals with this. Basically Validator can handle indexed properties, but the indexed error messages that it creates cannot be handled by the Struts custom JSP taglibs. Perhaps I can write some custom taglibs to work around this. On the subject of custom taglibs if anyone is interested I have created a simple tutorial based on a custom struts tag I created. It is a custom <div> tag that lets you change the class or id of the div when there are errors for the given property. Here is the link. http://www.cuberick.com/?p=2 Lemme know if you have any suggestions or questions.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 03:52:30PM -0500, Josh Cronemeyer wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:18:50AM -0500, Josh Cronemeyer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been playing with the indexedListProperty to validate what a user has > > selected in my forms. The problem I am having is that when an error message > > gets returned, It does not get associated with the form element > > (<html:multibox property="test"> in my case). I think the problem is that > > the message comes back with a key of test[x] where x is the index of the > > error. If I just print out my error messages like this <html:errors/> I can > > see the error message, but <html:errors property="test"/> doesn't show > > anything. It seems like the <html:errors> tag should have an > > indexedListProperty parameter as well so I can display my error messages > > correctly. What am i missing? > > > > Regards, > > > > josh cronemeyer > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > I've looked all over in the struts user guide and googled for information on > this. It appears that while the validator can handle validation of indexed > beans in forms, the struts JSP taglibs cannot handle the resulting indexed > messages. Could this be a bug? It sure looks that way. > > Thanks, > josh cronemeyer > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
