Hi, Rick. The fact is that this gentleman asked for an opinion that will influence his business. I think he deserves an honest answer, even if the "debate" might be old hat to you.
On 9/9/05, Rick Reumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Walton, Kaleb (ISS Southfield) wrote the following on 9/9/2005 9:17 AM: > > What do you mean by "inferior if you are interested in performance". Is > > the overhead of the dialog/navigation processing pretty high? > > Oh no:) Here we go again:)... > > JSF sucks. > No, Sruts sucks. > Spring rules. > No, Spring sucks. > Your momma. > No, Your momma! > Tapestry baby. > blah.. WebWorks! > No way, .NET For the win! > .NET, you're crazy. > Cocoon and Echo framework is the best. > Come on Flash all the way. > Your momma again. > <rinse><repeat> > > It's Friday right?:) > > -- > Rick > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
