It's funny, I started writing up an example with a subclass and an implemented interface and cloning and so on and so forth and as I got near the end I said "wait, this is stupid, just loop through with reflection as I and others suggested yesterday!"... Sometimes the "brute force" method really *is* the simplest and easiest :)
-- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex Technologies http://www.omnytex.com AIM: fzammetti Yahoo: fzammetti MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, October 28, 2005 3:56 pm, Dave Newton said: > Mick Knutson wrote: > >>Because I would have to modify generated code to do that. And it only >>implements serializable. Nothing else. >> >> > And you can't subclass it and have the subclass implement the interface? > > In any case, just loop through w/ reflection and check. > > I'm still confused though; are you calling methods on these classes > through reflection, which is why you won't catch these issues during > compilation? > > Dave > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
