On 12/1/05, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/1/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Put another way, my application depends on a Duck API, with methods like > > drumstick() and bill() and foot() that do things for me. Am I going to care > > if the internal implementation morphs into a Goose instead of a Duck? Naw > > ... I might appreciate the fact that I have some additional choices now, but > > as long as the framework has modes that walk like a duck and talk like a > > duck, I'm going to be satisfied. > > I will probably be satisfied too. I just don't want Goose to pretend > *being* Duck. > > Michael.
Uhm, what kind of eggs does the goose lay? As long as they are golden...I don't care if it's a duck, goose, or ostrich. Heck, I might prefer the ostrich...those eggs are HUGE. Larry --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
