>> That's not true; there are other committers who have done work under Shale.
This is probably my fault, but that's not what I meant. :) When I said "it has
nothing to do with
the Struts community, minus the creator," I am not talking about the people,
but the architecture.
As far as I can tell, Shale isn't about creating a new 2.0 or 3.0 of Struts,
but to create a
framework that specifically support JSF apps. Shale did not grow out of Struts
architecturally,
and I can't call either a revolution or evolution. It's just a whole different
application now and
I don't think it belongs as "Struts" per se, but it's own standalone project. I
think there is
more truth in that than the branding it has now.
Now I hope this opinion doesn't make me unlikeable on this forum ;-) Maybe I am
not holding the
party line, but I can't figure out why the Struts label is suddenly becoming a
multi-framework
branding. It just doesn't make sense to me and I think is the wrong decision
here. With that said,
I love Struts (the real one) and am committed to improving it.
> Why not leave it be and put your (collective) energy towards building >
> something you want to
use instead of kibitzing about something you > don't? There are plenty of open
tickets for Struts
1.x....
I've been slowly doing this already in Bugzilla. I hope others dedicate their
free time to
improving Struts too.
Paul
__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
