Just my 2 cents. If you design an application you can consider using different frameworks for different application parts. Struts is there for the presentation layer only. Struts doesn't care for the business logic in behind, and this makes you more flexible. You can use ejb with struts, or spring with struts, or pico, or whatever.
Comparing struts with spring is like comparing a your cars controls with the motor. Sure you can do it, but it makes no sense. Personally, I think the power of struts is that it only covers the presentation and doesn't influence your architecture. It's focused and good in its focus :-) regards leon On 3/13/06, Jubin Kuriakose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Out of curiousity, how does that translate to "saturation" in your > > opinion? > > > > > I didn't come to an conclusion from this one article... It is the general > opnion that struts is a mature and complete product and most programmers > would choose struts. > But its growth is limited to being a webframework only. Spring on the other > hand is the whole deal. > Struts have grown in almost all areas that concerns web development eg. > validation security, presentation etc. And If you need another framework > like Spring to carry it to the next step then its because it cant do it by > itsself. also > Its only an opinion by the way. dont crucify me. > > sincerley jubs > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
