Frank W. Zammetti wrote: > Your right, 99% of this has been philosophy debating. What's wrong > with that? Philosophy is what open-source is based on, so why is it > wrong to question the foundations every now and again?
Who said it was wrong? I said _I_ wished the thread would go away because _I_ feel it has ceased to be useful and _I_ feel it's doing more harm than good at this point and _I_ feel that very little, if anything, positive will happen as a result. I am equally free to post that opinion. But now it's spun off on yet _another_ useless thread about the death of democracy and freedom because _I_ feel the thread has gone beyond the point of usefulness. You want a democracy on a national level move somewhere where there's proportional representation, direct elections, the amount of money one has to spend cannot alter voter perception, etc. You want a democracy on an open-source project level start your own. Oh, you did. Oh, wait, you have weighted votes. > [...] but I voted for Bush this past election. Seemed like the right choice at the time. I can't even imagine a thought process that arrives at this conclusion, but that's yet another spin cycle. > Is it disheartening to confront differing ideas and ways of thinking? No, it's disheartening to spin in circles. All done; you guys go ahead without me, I'll catch up with you on the technical side. Dave --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
